EQT CORPORATION (EQT) valuation

Share price $58.91 · Close 2026-04-24

Price-to-Earnings

P/E · Trailing Diluted
11.18×
P/E history →

Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow

P/FCF · Trailing
12.78×
P/FCF history →

Free-Cash-Flow Yield

FCF Yield · Trailing
7.82%
FCF Yield history →

Enterprise-Value-to-EBITDA

EV/EBITDA · Trailing
5.76×
EV/EBITDA history →

Price-to-Sales

P/S · Trailing
3.60×
P/S history →

Price-to-Book

P/B · Latest filing
1.48×
P/B history →

Expectations investing: what does the price imply?

Scenario margin +19pp above start

Rappaport-style reverse-DCF. We start from the current market price ($58.91 × 629.2M shares = $37.07B market cap, $42.73B enterprise value) and solve for the operating path that would justify it.

To reconcile today's price with a plausible scenario, the model lands on:

  • Year-1 revenue growth: 0.8%
    Source is analyst consensus (absolute forecast, TTM-anchored) of -5.2%; the scenario bumped Y1 by +6.0pp to reconcile.
  • Target EBIT margin (Y10): 50.8%
    Scenario lands above the 3-yr max of 45.9% (starting 32.2%, ending 50.8%).
  • High-growth plateau: 3 years
    Tier default for Y2 at -0.6%.

at or below the reference above the reference outside the historical band

Where the PV comes from
Y1–3
+9%
Y4–10
+15%
Terminal
+76%

Share of the total PV the model has assigned to each window. The further out a cash flow sits, the harder it is to estimate — so readers can weigh how much of the scenario rests on the near, plateau, and post-horizon periods.

Facts · TTM as of 2026-03-31 (Q12026)

Share price
$58.91
Diluted shares
629.2M
Total debt
$5.99B
Cash & equivalents
$326.6M
Revenue
$10.28B
EBIT (GAAP)
$4.79B
EBIT margin (GAAP)
46.6%
Operating cash flow
$6.44B
CapEx
$2.39B
Observed YoY growth
83.6%
Analyst current-FY growth
12.8%
Analyst next-FY growth
-0.6%
3-year revenue CAGR
-5.3%

Assumptions

Initial revenue growth
-5.2%
from analyst consensus (absolute forecast, TTM-anchored)
(analyst FY-over-FY consensus: 12.8% — shown effective rate normalises it against our TTM base, which spans the current FY partway)
Year-2 growth
-0.6%
from analyst next-FY consensus
Starting EBIT margin
32.2%
from 3-year mean EBIT margin (latest FY deviates > 5pp)
Tax rate
17.5%
from 3-year median of EffectiveTaxRate
Starting ROIC
12.8%
NOPAT₀ ÷ invested capital, capped at 40.0%

Constants

Horizon
10 years
WACC
9.0%
Terminal growth
2.5%
Terminal ROIC
11.0%

Yearly projection

Year Revenue Growth EBIT Margin NOPAT ROIC Reinvestment FCF Discount PV of FCF
1 $10.37B 0.8% $3.53B 34.0% $2.91B 12.6% $0 $2.91B 0.917 $2.67B
2 $10.93B 5.4% $3.92B 35.9% $3.23B 12.5% $2.62B $619.8M 0.842 $521.7M
3 $11.52B 5.4% $4.35B 37.8% $3.59B 12.3% $2.87B $715.5M 0.772 $552.5M
4 $12.10B 5.0% $4.79B 39.6% $3.95B 12.1% $3.02B $930.1M 0.708 $658.9M
5 $12.65B 4.6% $5.25B 41.5% $4.33B 11.9% $3.16B $1.17B 0.650 $762.3M
6 $13.18B 4.2% $5.72B 43.4% $4.71B 11.7% $3.27B $1.44B 0.596 $861.4M
7 $13.67B 3.7% $6.19B 45.2% $5.10B 11.5% $3.35B $1.75B 0.547 $955.1M
8 $14.13B 3.3% $6.66B 47.1% $5.49B 11.4% $3.41B $2.08B 0.502 $1.04B
9 $14.54B 2.9% $7.12B 49.0% $5.87B 11.2% $3.43B $2.44B 0.460 $1.12B
10 $14.91B 2.5% $7.58B 50.8% $6.25B 11.0% $3.42B $2.83B 0.422 $1.19B
Sum of PV of FCF (years 1-10) $10.34B

Terminal value

NOPATN+1
$6.40B
ReinvestmentN+1
$1.42B
FCFN+1
$4.98B
Terminal value (undiscounted)
$76.69B
PV of terminal value
$32.39B
Gordon-growth: TV = FCFN+1 ÷ (WACC − g) = $4.98B ÷ (9.0% − 2.5%).

Equity bridge

PV of operating FCF $10.34B
+ PV of terminal value $32.39B
= Enterprise value $42.73B
− Total debt $5.99B
+ Cash & equivalents $326.6M
= Equity value $37.07B
÷ Diluted shares 629.2M
= DCF PV / share $58.91
Market price $58.91
Reconciliation delta +0.0% (≈ 0 by construction)
Full calculation trail Click to expand — every number on this page derived step by step.

0 · TTM reconstruction (anchor: Q12026, 2026-03-31)

The latest filing is a 10-Q, so "base year" revenue / EBIT / OCF / CapEx are reconstructed as trailing-twelve-month values. Per-quarter facts (typical for income-statement items) get summed across four quarters; YTD-cumulative facts (typical for cash-flow items) use prior FY + YTDnow − YTDprior year same quarter.

Revenue
Sum of the four most recent per-quarter values
  • Q1 FY26 (2026-03-31): $3.38B
  • Q4 FY25 (2025-12-31): $2.39B
  • Q3 FY25 (2025-09-30): $1.96B
  • Q2 FY25 (2025-06-30): $2.56B
  • = $10.28B
EBIT
Sum of the four most recent per-quarter values
  • Q1 FY26 (2026-03-31): $2.04B
  • Q4 FY25 (2025-12-31): $1.02B
  • Q3 FY25 (2025-09-30): $603.2M
  • Q2 FY25 (2025-06-30): $1.13B
  • = $4.79B
OCF
Prior FY + current-quarter YTD − same-quarter-prior-year YTD
  • FY FY25 (2025-12-31): +$5.13B
  • Q1 FY26 (2026-03-31) YTD: +$3.06B
  • Q1 FY25 (2025-03-31) YTD: −$1.74B
  • = $6.44B
CapEx
Prior FY + current-quarter YTD − same-quarter-prior-year YTD
  • FY FY25 (2025-12-31): +$2.29B
  • Q1 FY26 (2026-03-31) YTD: +$598.5M
  • Q1 FY25 (2025-03-31) YTD: −$499.6M
  • = $2.39B
Prior-year TTM revenue (growth-calc baseline)
Sum of the four most recent per-quarter values
  • Q1 FY25 (2025-03-31): $1.74B
  • Q4 FY24 (2024-12-31): $1.62B
  • Q3 FY24 (2024-09-30): $1.28B
  • Q2 FY24 (2024-06-30): $952.5M
  • = $5.60B

1 · Enterprise-value target (what the DCF must match)

Market cap   = price × diluted shares
             = $58.91 × 629.2M
             = $37.07B

EV target    = market cap + total debt − cash & equivalents
             = $37.07B + $5.99B − $326.6M
             = $42.73B
            

2 · Starting NOPAT (base year 0)

GAAP EBIT          = $4.79B   (46.6% of revenue)
× (1 − tax rate)  = × (1 − 17.5%) = × 0.8246
= NOPAT₀            = $3.95B
            

3 · Invested capital & starting ROIC

Invested capital = total debt + book equity − cash
                 = $5.99B + $25.12B − $326.6M
                 = $30.78B

Raw ROIC₀        = NOPAT₀ / Invested capital
                 = $3.95B / $30.78B
                 = 12.8%
(no cap applied; raw value is within the 40.0% ceiling)
            

4 · Growth path construction

Source       = analyst consensus (absolute forecast, TTM-anchored): Y1 = -5.2%, Y2 = -0.6%
Clamp        = [2.5%, 60%] (no sub-terminal or 60%+ starts)
Plateau rate = -0.6% (Y2 — held from year 2 through end of plateau)
Tier         = 3 years (rule: plateau rate < 15% → 3y, < 25% → 5y, else 7y)
Plateau      = 3 years
Fade         = linear from effective Y2 to terminal 2.5% across the remaining 7 years

Effective Y1 growth after solver bumps = 0.8%
Effective Y2 growth after solver bumps = 5.4%
Growth by year:
  Y1 = 0.8%
  Y2 = 5.4%
  Y3 = 5.4%
  Y4 = 5.0%
  Y5 = 4.6%
  Y6 = 4.2%
  Y7 = 3.7%
  Y8 = 3.3%
  Y9 = 2.9%
  Y10 = 2.5%
            

5 · Margin path construction

Starting margin (Y0) = 32.2%   (source: 3-year mean EBIT margin (latest FY deviates > 5pp))
Target margin (Y10)  = 50.8%   (solver output, normal band)
Year-t margin        = starting + (target − starting) × (t / 10)
Margin by year:
  Y1 = 34.0%
  Y2 = 35.9%
  Y3 = 37.8%
  Y4 = 39.6%
  Y5 = 41.5%
  Y6 = 43.4%
  Y7 = 45.2%
  Y8 = 47.1%
  Y9 = 49.0%
  Y10 = 50.8%
            

6 · ROIC path construction

The capex heuristic compares latest-period CapEx ($2.39B) against the Normalized CapEx (3-yr mean) of $2.19B — mean of the last three annual CapEx values. When the latest is above 1.4× that mean and CapEx is at least 5% of revenue, we treat the filer as capital-intensive and mid-investment, hold ROIC flat for a 5-year harvest phase, and only then fade to terminal ROIC. The 3-yr mean does not feed the DCF directly — it only gates this flag.

Capex-heuristic inactive (latest CapEx 1.09× the 3-yr mean of $2.19B — below the 1.4× / 5%-of-revenue gates).
Fade from Y1: ROIC_t = ROIC₀ + (ROIC_terminal − ROIC₀) × (t / 10)
ROIC₀ = 12.8%; ROIC_terminal = 11.0%

ROIC by year:
  Y1 = 12.6%
  Y2 = 12.5%
  Y3 = 12.3%
  Y4 = 12.1%
  Y5 = 11.9%
  Y6 = 11.7%
  Y7 = 11.5%
  Y8 = 11.4%
  Y9 = 11.2%
  Y10 = 11.0%
            

7 · Solver iterations

Each row is one bisection attempt. The solver sweeps Y1 growth bumps 0pp → +20pp across the plateau ladder inside the normal margin bracket, then — if nothing reconciles — repeats the same sweep in a widened margin band ([-10%, 80%]). The first feasible attempt is the one the page uses. If no combination reconciles, the page shows the attempt whose PV sits closest to the target EV so both levers are balanced.

# Phase Plateau Y1 bump Solved margin PV(EV) vs target Feasible?
1 normal 3y +0pp 52.8% $36.54B −14.5% no
2 normal 3y +2pp 52.8% $38.69B −9.5% no
3 normal 3y +4pp 52.8% $41.00B −4.0% no
4 normal 3y +6pp 50.8% $42.73B +0.0% yes ✓

8 · Terminal value derivation

NOPAT_{N+1}         = NOPAT_{10} × (1 + g_terminal)
                    = $6.25B × (1 + 2.5%)
                    = $6.40B

ΔNOPAT              = NOPAT_{N+1} − NOPAT_{10}
                    = $156.2M
Reinvestment_{N+1}  = ΔNOPAT / ROIC_terminal
                    = $156.2M / 11.0%
                    = $1.42B

FCF_{N+1}           = NOPAT_{N+1} − Reinvestment_{N+1}
                    = $6.40B − $1.42B
                    = $4.98B

Terminal value (TV) = FCF_{N+1} / (WACC − g_terminal)
                    = $4.98B / (9.0% − 2.5%)
                    = $76.69B

PV(TV)              = TV / (1 + WACC)^10
                    = $76.69B / 2.367
                    = $32.39B
            

9 · Reconciliation check (DCF PV vs. the market)

This isn't a fair value — it's the inverse check. The solver built the scenario so that DCF PV reproduces the current enterprise value; if the normal bracket worked the delta below is ~0 by construction. A non-zero delta only appears when the solver fell through to the widened margin band.

Σ PV(FCF_1..10) = $10.34B
+ PV(TV)          = $32.39B
= Enterprise value = $42.73B   (≈ EV target $42.73B by construction)
− Total debt      = $5.99B
+ Cash            = $326.6M
= Equity value    = $37.07B
÷ Diluted shares  = 629.2M
= DCF PV / share  = $58.91

Market price      = $58.91
Reconciliation Δ  = +0.0%   (≈ 0 by construction — the solver anchored on this price)
            
Open this scenario in the calculator →
Every input above is pre-filled; the calculator auto-runs and lets you override any assumption.

Every rule above — growth-source priority, plateau tiers, compound cap, solver ladder, flag colours — is documented on the expectations scenario methodology.

What these ratios mean & how they're built: see the valuation ratios glossary on the company-facts methodology page — per-ratio definitions and the exact us-gaap concepts behind each numerator and denominator.

Sources. Denominators come from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings for EQT (CIK 0000033213); analyst growth forecasts come from analyst consensus. Share price is the latest split-adjusted close from our daily history (live quote as fallback). Per-share denominators are split-adjusted to today's share count.