GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. (GILD) valuation

Share price $130.40 · Close 2026-04-24

Price-to-Earnings

P/E · Trailing Diluted
19.26×
P/E history →

Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow

P/FCF · Trailing
17.31×
P/FCF history →

Free-Cash-Flow Yield

FCF Yield · Trailing
5.78%
FCF Yield history →

Enterprise-Value-to-EBITDA

EV/EBITDA · Trailing
17.30×
EV/EBITDA history →

Price-to-Sales

P/S · Trailing
5.50×
P/S history →

Price-to-Book

P/B · Latest filing
7.13×
P/B history →

Expectations investing: what does the price imply?

Scenario margin +16pp above start

Rappaport-style reverse-DCF. We start from the current market price ($130.40 × 1.24B shares = $161.83B market cap, $179.80B enterprise value) and solve for the operating path that would justify it.

To reconcile today's price with a plausible scenario, the model lands on:

  • Year-1 revenue growth: 18.6%
    Source is analyst consensus of 2.6%; the scenario bumped Y1 by +16.0pp to reconcile.
  • Target EBIT margin (Y10): 38.8%
    Scenario lands above the 3-yr max of 34.0% (starting 22.6%, ending 38.8%).
  • High-growth plateau: 3 years
    Tier default for Y2 at 6.1%.

at or below the reference above the reference outside the historical band

Where the PV comes from
Y1–3
+1%
Y4–10
+2%
Terminal
+97%

Share of the total PV the model has assigned to each window. The further out a cash flow sits, the harder it is to estimate — so readers can weigh how much of the scenario rests on the near, plateau, and post-horizon periods.

Facts · FY2025 (2025-12-31)

Share price
$130.40
Diluted shares
1.24B
Total debt
$25.54B
Cash & equivalents
$7.56B
Revenue
$29.44B
EBIT (GAAP)
$10.02B
EBIT margin (GAAP)
34.0%
Operating cash flow
$10.02B
CapEx
$563.0M
Observed YoY growth
2.4%
Analyst current-FY growth
2.6%
Analyst next-FY growth
6.1%
3-year revenue CAGR
2.6%

Assumptions

Initial revenue growth
2.6%
from analyst consensus
Year-2 growth
6.1%
from analyst next-FY consensus
Starting EBIT margin
22.6%
from 3-year mean EBIT margin (latest FY deviates > 5pp)
Tax rate
18.2%
from 3-year median of EffectiveTaxRate
Starting ROIC
20.2%
NOPAT₀ ÷ invested capital, capped at 40.0%

Constants

Horizon
10 years
WACC
9.0%
Terminal growth
2.5%
Terminal ROIC
11.0%

Yearly projection

Year Revenue Growth EBIT Margin NOPAT ROIC Reinvestment FCF Discount PV of FCF
1 $34.93B 18.6% $8.46B 24.2% $6.93B 19.2% $0 $6.93B 0.917 $6.35B
2 $42.63B 22.1% $11.02B 25.9% $9.02B 18.3% $11.41B -$2.40B 0.842 -$2.02B
3 $52.05B 22.1% $14.29B 27.5% $11.70B 17.4% $15.38B -$3.69B 0.772 -$2.85B
4 $62.08B 19.3% $18.05B 29.1% $14.77B 16.5% $18.64B -$3.87B 0.708 -$2.74B
5 $72.31B 16.5% $22.19B 30.7% $18.16B 15.6% $21.76B -$3.60B 0.650 -$2.34B
6 $82.21B 13.7% $26.56B 32.3% $21.73B 14.7% $24.35B -$2.62B 0.596 -$1.56B
7 $91.16B 10.9% $30.92B 33.9% $25.30B 13.7% $25.97B -$669.7M 0.547 -$366.3M
8 $98.53B 8.1% $35.01B 35.5% $28.65B 12.8% $26.10B $2.55B 0.502 $1.28B
9 $103.75B 5.3% $38.54B 37.1% $31.54B 11.9% $24.23B $7.30B 0.460 $3.36B
10 $106.35B 2.5% $41.22B 38.8% $33.73B 11.0% $19.94B $13.79B 0.422 $5.83B
Sum of PV of FCF (years 1-10) $4.95B

Terminal value

NOPATN+1
$34.57B
ReinvestmentN+1
$7.67B
FCFN+1
$26.91B
Terminal value (undiscounted)
$413.95B
PV of terminal value
$174.86B
Gordon-growth: TV = FCFN+1 ÷ (WACC − g) = $26.91B ÷ (9.0% − 2.5%).

Equity bridge

PV of operating FCF $4.95B
+ PV of terminal value $174.86B
= Enterprise value $179.80B
− Total debt $25.54B
+ Cash & equivalents $7.56B
= Equity value $161.83B
÷ Diluted shares 1.24B
= DCF PV / share $130.40
Market price $130.40
Reconciliation delta −0.0% (≈ 0 by construction)
Full calculation trail Click to expand — every number on this page derived step by step.

1 · Enterprise-value target (what the DCF must match)

Market cap   = price × diluted shares
             = $130.40 × 1.24B
             = $161.83B

EV target    = market cap + total debt − cash & equivalents
             = $161.83B + $25.54B − $7.56B
             = $179.80B
            

2 · Starting NOPAT (base year 0)

GAAP EBIT          = $10.02B   (34.0% of revenue)
× (1 − tax rate)  = × (1 − 18.2%) = × 0.8182
= NOPAT₀            = $8.20B
            

3 · Invested capital & starting ROIC

Invested capital = total debt + book equity − cash
                 = $25.54B + $22.70B − $7.56B
                 = $40.68B

Raw ROIC₀        = NOPAT₀ / Invested capital
                 = $8.20B / $40.68B
                 = 20.2%
(no cap applied; raw value is within the 40.0% ceiling)
            

4 · Growth path construction

Source       = analyst consensus: Y1 = 2.6%, Y2 = 6.1%
Clamp        = [2.5%, 60%] (no sub-terminal or 60%+ starts)
Plateau rate = 6.1% (Y2 — held from year 2 through end of plateau)
Tier         = 3 years (rule: plateau rate < 15% → 3y, < 25% → 5y, else 7y)
Plateau      = 3 years
Fade         = linear from effective Y2 to terminal 2.5% across the remaining 7 years

Effective Y1 growth after solver bumps = 18.6%
Effective Y2 growth after solver bumps = 22.1%
Growth by year:
  Y1 = 18.6%
  Y2 = 22.1%
  Y3 = 22.1%
  Y4 = 19.3%
  Y5 = 16.5%
  Y6 = 13.7%
  Y7 = 10.9%
  Y8 = 8.1%
  Y9 = 5.3%
  Y10 = 2.5%
            

5 · Margin path construction

Starting margin (Y0) = 22.6%   (source: 3-year mean EBIT margin (latest FY deviates > 5pp))
Target margin (Y10)  = 38.8%   (solver output, normal band)
Year-t margin        = starting + (target − starting) × (t / 10)
Margin by year:
  Y1 = 24.2%
  Y2 = 25.9%
  Y3 = 27.5%
  Y4 = 29.1%
  Y5 = 30.7%
  Y6 = 32.3%
  Y7 = 33.9%
  Y8 = 35.5%
  Y9 = 37.1%
  Y10 = 38.8%
            

6 · ROIC path construction

The capex heuristic compares latest-period CapEx ($563.0M) against the Normalized CapEx (3-yr mean) of $557.0M — mean of the last three annual CapEx values. When the latest is above 1.4× that mean and CapEx is at least 5% of revenue, we treat the filer as capital-intensive and mid-investment, hold ROIC flat for a 5-year harvest phase, and only then fade to terminal ROIC. The 3-yr mean does not feed the DCF directly — it only gates this flag.

Capex-heuristic inactive (latest CapEx 1.01× the 3-yr mean of $557.0M — below the 1.4× / 5%-of-revenue gates).
Fade from Y1: ROIC_t = ROIC₀ + (ROIC_terminal − ROIC₀) × (t / 10)
ROIC₀ = 20.2%; ROIC_terminal = 11.0%

ROIC by year:
  Y1 = 19.2%
  Y2 = 18.3%
  Y3 = 17.4%
  Y4 = 16.5%
  Y5 = 15.6%
  Y6 = 14.7%
  Y7 = 13.7%
  Y8 = 12.8%
  Y9 = 11.9%
  Y10 = 11.0%
            

7 · Solver iterations

Each row is one bisection attempt. The solver sweeps Y1 growth bumps 0pp → +20pp across the plateau ladder inside the normal margin bracket, then — if nothing reconciles — repeats the same sweep in a widened margin band ([-10%, 80%]). The first feasible attempt is the one the page uses. If no combination reconciles, the page shows the attempt whose PV sits closest to the target EV so both levers are balanced.

# Phase Plateau Y1 bump Solved margin PV(EV) vs target Feasible?
1 normal 3y +0pp 39.1% $100.48B −44.1% no
2 normal 3y +2pp 39.1% $108.01B −39.9% no
3 normal 3y +4pp 39.1% $116.16B −35.4% no
4 normal 3y +6pp 39.1% $124.97B −30.5% no
5 normal 3y +8pp 39.1% $134.51B −25.2% no
6 normal 3y +10pp 39.1% $144.83B −19.5% no
7 normal 3y +12pp 39.1% $155.97B −13.3% no
8 normal 3y +14pp 39.1% $168.01B −6.6% no
9 normal 3y +16pp 38.8% $179.80B −0.0% yes ✓

8 · Terminal value derivation

NOPAT_{N+1}         = NOPAT_{10} × (1 + g_terminal)
                    = $33.73B × (1 + 2.5%)
                    = $34.57B

ΔNOPAT              = NOPAT_{N+1} − NOPAT_{10}
                    = $843.2M
Reinvestment_{N+1}  = ΔNOPAT / ROIC_terminal
                    = $843.2M / 11.0%
                    = $7.67B

FCF_{N+1}           = NOPAT_{N+1} − Reinvestment_{N+1}
                    = $34.57B − $7.67B
                    = $26.91B

Terminal value (TV) = FCF_{N+1} / (WACC − g_terminal)
                    = $26.91B / (9.0% − 2.5%)
                    = $413.95B

PV(TV)              = TV / (1 + WACC)^10
                    = $413.95B / 2.367
                    = $174.86B
            

9 · Reconciliation check (DCF PV vs. the market)

This isn't a fair value — it's the inverse check. The solver built the scenario so that DCF PV reproduces the current enterprise value; if the normal bracket worked the delta below is ~0 by construction. A non-zero delta only appears when the solver fell through to the widened margin band.

Σ PV(FCF_1..10) = $4.95B
+ PV(TV)          = $174.86B
= Enterprise value = $179.80B   (≈ EV target $179.80B by construction)
− Total debt      = $25.54B
+ Cash            = $7.56B
= Equity value    = $161.83B
÷ Diluted shares  = 1.24B
= DCF PV / share  = $130.40

Market price      = $130.40
Reconciliation Δ  = −0.0%   (≈ 0 by construction — the solver anchored on this price)
            
Open this scenario in the calculator →
Every input above is pre-filled; the calculator auto-runs and lets you override any assumption.

Every rule above — growth-source priority, plateau tiers, compound cap, solver ladder, flag colours — is documented on the expectations scenario methodology.

What these ratios mean & how they're built: see the valuation ratios glossary on the company-facts methodology page — per-ratio definitions and the exact us-gaap concepts behind each numerator and denominator.

Sources. Denominators come from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings for GILD (CIK 0000882095); analyst growth forecasts come from analyst consensus. Share price is the latest split-adjusted close from our daily history (live quote as fallback). Per-share denominators are split-adjusted to today's share count.