Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH) valuation

Share price $27.13 · Close 2026-04-24

Price-to-Earnings

P/E · Trailing Diluted
28.26×
P/E history →

Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow

P/FCF · Trailing
14.12×
P/FCF history →

Free-Cash-Flow Yield

FCF Yield · Trailing
7.08%
FCF Yield history →

Enterprise-Value-to-EBITDA

EV/EBITDA · Trailing
31.52×
EV/EBITDA history →

Price-to-Sales

P/S · Trailing
6.07×
P/S history →

Price-to-Book

P/B · Latest filing
1.74×
P/B history →

Expectations investing: what does the price imply?

Stress figure — solve did not fully reconcile

Rappaport-style reverse-DCF. We start from the current market price ($27.13 × 610.8M shares = $16.57B market cap, $24.86B enterprise value) and solve for the operating path that would justify it.

To reconcile today's price with a plausible scenario, the model lands on:

  • Year-1 revenue growth: 21.9%
    Source is analyst consensus of 1.9%; the scenario bumped Y1 by +20.0pp and still needed the margin band widened — both levers are at stretch.
  • Target EBIT margin (Y10): 80.0%
    Scenario lands on 80.0%, above the historical band (3-yr range 31.3%–35.1%). The reconciliation needs a margin the filer has not shown.
  • High-growth plateau: 5 years
    Stretched from the 3-year tier default to 5 — the default couldn't reconcile with today's price.

at or below the reference above the reference outside the historical band

Where the PV comes from
Y1–3
-93%
Y4–10
-139%
Terminal
+332%

Share of the total PV the model has assigned to each window. The further out a cash flow sits, the harder it is to estimate — so readers can weigh how much of the scenario rests on the near, plateau, and post-horizon periods.

Reconciliation gap
−58.4%
DCF PV/share $11.29 vs market $27.13. The solver couldn't fully reconcile; the gap measures how much the stress-band assumptions still fall short.

Facts · FY2025 (2025-12-31)

Share price
$27.13
Diluted shares
610.8M
Total debt
$8.42B
Cash & equivalents
$130.0M
Revenue
$2.73B
Pretax income (cont. ops)
$941.3M
Filer does not tag us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss; using pretax income from continuing operations as the operating-income base. For banks this is effectively operating income (interest expense is a core cost); for oil majors and some pharma filers it's a close proxy with small non-operating items mixed in.
Pretax margin
34.5%
Operating cash flow
$1.21B
CapEx
$28.3M
Observed YoY growth
4.2%
Analyst current-FY growth
1.9%
Analyst next-FY growth
2.3%
3-year revenue CAGR
6.8%

Assumptions

Initial revenue growth
1.9%
from analyst consensus
Year-2 growth
2.3%
from analyst next-FY consensus
Starting EBIT margin
34.5%
from latest FY EBIT margin (GAAP)
Tax rate
0.0%
from 0% (REIT pass-through tax exemption)
Starting ROIC
5.3%
NOPAT₀ ÷ invested capital, capped at 40.0%

Constants

Horizon
10 years
WACC
9.0%
Terminal growth
2.5%
Terminal ROIC
11.0%

Yearly projection

Year Revenue Growth EBIT Margin NOPAT ROIC Reinvestment FCF Discount PV of FCF
1 $3.33B 21.9% $1.30B 39.0% $1.30B 5.9% $6.10B -$4.81B 0.917 -$4.41B
2 $4.07B 22.3% $1.77B 43.6% $1.77B 6.4% $7.39B -$5.62B 0.842 -$4.73B
3 $4.98B 22.3% $2.40B 48.1% $2.40B 7.0% $8.89B -$6.50B 0.772 -$5.02B
4 $6.09B 22.3% $3.21B 52.7% $3.21B 7.6% $10.72B -$7.52B 0.708 -$5.32B
5 $7.45B 22.3% $4.26B 57.2% $4.26B 8.1% $12.95B -$8.69B 0.650 -$5.65B
6 $8.81B 18.4% $5.45B 61.8% $5.45B 8.7% $13.58B -$8.14B 0.596 -$4.85B
7 $10.08B 14.4% $6.69B 66.3% $6.69B 9.3% $13.38B -$6.69B 0.547 -$3.66B
8 $11.13B 10.4% $7.89B 70.9% $7.89B 9.9% $12.21B -$4.32B 0.502 -$2.17B
9 $11.85B 6.5% $8.94B 75.4% $8.94B 10.4% $10.06B -$1.12B 0.460 -$516.6M
10 $12.15B 2.5% $9.72B 80.0% $9.72B 11.0% $7.06B $2.66B 0.422 $1.12B
Sum of PV of FCF (years 1-10) -$35.20B

Terminal value

NOPATN+1
$9.96B
ReinvestmentN+1
$2.21B
FCFN+1
$7.75B
Terminal value (undiscounted)
$119.27B
PV of terminal value
$50.38B
Gordon-growth: TV = FCFN+1 ÷ (WACC − g) = $7.75B ÷ (9.0% − 2.5%).

Equity bridge

PV of operating FCF -$35.20B
+ PV of terminal value $50.38B
= Enterprise value $15.18B
− Total debt $8.42B
+ Cash & equivalents $130.0M
= Equity value $6.89B
÷ Diluted shares 610.8M
= DCF PV / share $11.29
Market price $27.13
Reconciliation delta −58.4% (widened band)
Full calculation trail Click to expand — every number on this page derived step by step.

1 · Enterprise-value target (what the DCF must match)

Market cap   = price × diluted shares
             = $27.13 × 610.8M
             = $16.57B

EV target    = market cap + total debt − cash & equivalents
             = $16.57B + $8.42B − $130.0M
             = $24.86B
            

2 · Starting NOPAT (base year 0)

GAAP EBIT          = $941.3M   (34.5% of revenue)
× (1 − tax rate)  = × (1 − 0.0%) = × 1.0000
= NOPAT₀            = $941.3M
            

3 · Invested capital & starting ROIC

Invested capital = total debt + book equity − cash
                 = $8.42B + $9.53B − $130.0M
                 = $17.82B

Raw ROIC₀        = NOPAT₀ / Invested capital
                 = $941.3M / $17.82B
                 = 5.3%
(no cap applied; raw value is within the 40.0% ceiling)
            

4 · Growth path construction

Source       = analyst consensus: Y1 = 1.9%, Y2 = 2.3%
Clamp        = [2.5%, 60%] (no sub-terminal or 60%+ starts)
Plateau rate = 2.3% (Y2 — held from year 2 through end of plateau)
Tier         = 3 years (rule: plateau rate < 15% → 3y, < 25% → 5y, else 7y)
Solver ext.  = 5 years (solver extended to reconcile the DCF with the current price)
Plateau      = 5 years
Fade         = linear from effective Y2 to terminal 2.5% across the remaining 5 years

Effective Y1 growth after solver bumps = 21.9%
Effective Y2 growth after solver bumps = 22.3%
Growth by year:
  Y1 = 21.9%
  Y2 = 22.3%
  Y3 = 22.3%
  Y4 = 22.3%
  Y5 = 22.3%
  Y6 = 18.4%
  Y7 = 14.4%
  Y8 = 10.4%
  Y9 = 6.5%
  Y10 = 2.5%
            

5 · Margin path construction

Starting margin (Y0) = 34.5%   (source: latest FY EBIT margin (GAAP))
Target margin (Y10)  = 80.0%   (solver output, widened band)
Year-t margin        = starting + (target − starting) × (t / 10)
Margin by year:
  Y1 = 39.0%
  Y2 = 43.6%
  Y3 = 48.1%
  Y4 = 52.7%
  Y5 = 57.2%
  Y6 = 61.8%
  Y7 = 66.3%
  Y8 = 70.9%
  Y9 = 75.4%
  Y10 = 80.0%
            

6 · ROIC path construction

The capex heuristic compares latest-period CapEx ($28.3M) against the Normalized CapEx (3-yr mean) of $29.7M — mean of the last three annual CapEx values. When the latest is above 1.4× that mean and CapEx is at least 5% of revenue, we treat the filer as capital-intensive and mid-investment, hold ROIC flat for a 5-year harvest phase, and only then fade to terminal ROIC. The 3-yr mean does not feed the DCF directly — it only gates this flag.

Capex-heuristic inactive (latest CapEx 0.95× the 3-yr mean of $29.7M — below the 1.4× / 5%-of-revenue gates).
Fade from Y1: ROIC_t = ROIC₀ + (ROIC_terminal − ROIC₀) × (t / 10)
ROIC₀ = 5.3%; ROIC_terminal = 11.0%

ROIC by year:
  Y1 = 5.9%
  Y2 = 6.4%
  Y3 = 7.0%
  Y4 = 7.6%
  Y5 = 8.1%
  Y6 = 8.7%
  Y7 = 9.3%
  Y8 = 9.9%
  Y9 = 10.4%
  Y10 = 11.0%
            

7 · Solver iterations

Each row is one bisection attempt. The solver sweeps Y1 growth bumps 0pp → +20pp across the plateau ladder inside the normal margin bracket, then — if nothing reconciles — repeats the same sweep in a widened margin band ([-10%, 80%]). The first feasible attempt is the one the page uses. If no combination reconciles, the page shows the attempt whose PV sits closest to the target EV so both levers are balanced.

# Phase Plateau Y1 bump Solved margin PV(EV) vs target Feasible?
1 normal 3y +0pp 41.4% $11.00B −55.7% no
2 normal 3y +2pp 41.4% $10.93B −56.0% no
3 normal 3y +4pp 41.4% $10.88B −56.2% no
4 normal 3y +6pp 41.4% $10.83B −56.4% no
5 normal 3y +8pp 41.4% $10.80B −56.5% no
6 normal 3y +10pp 41.4% $10.79B −56.6% no
7 normal 3y +12pp 41.4% $10.79B −56.6% no
8 normal 3y +14pp 41.4% $10.81B −56.5% no
9 normal 3y +16pp 41.4% $10.85B −56.3% no
10 normal 3y +18pp 41.4% $10.92B −56.1% no
11 normal 3y +20pp 41.4% $11.02B −55.7% no
12 normal 5y +0pp 41.4% $11.00B −55.8% no
13 normal 5y +2pp 41.4% $10.96B −55.9% no
14 normal 5y +4pp 41.4% $10.94B −56.0% no
15 normal 5y +6pp 41.4% $10.94B −56.0% no
16 normal 5y +8pp 41.4% $10.96B −55.9% no
17 normal 5y +10pp 41.4% $11.01B −55.7% no
18 normal 5y +12pp 41.4% $11.10B −55.4% no
19 normal 5y +14pp 41.4% $11.21B −54.9% no
20 normal 5y +16pp 41.4% $11.37B −54.2% no
21 normal 5y +18pp 41.4% $11.57B −53.4% no
22 normal 5y +20pp 41.4% $11.83B −52.4% no
23 widened 3y +0pp 80.0% $11.21B −54.9% no
24 widened 3y +2pp 80.0% $11.27B −54.7% no
25 widened 3y +4pp 80.0% $11.34B −54.4% no
26 widened 3y +6pp 80.0% $11.46B −53.9% no
27 widened 3y +8pp 80.0% $11.60B −53.3% no
28 widened 3y +10pp 80.0% $11.78B −52.6% no
29 widened 3y +12pp 80.0% $12.01B −51.7% no
30 widened 3y +14pp 80.0% $12.29B −50.6% no
31 widened 3y +16pp 80.0% $12.62B −49.2% no
32 widened 3y +18pp 80.0% $13.00B −47.7% no
33 widened 3y +20pp 80.0% $13.46B −45.9% no
34 widened 5y +0pp 80.0% $11.21B −54.9% no
35 widened 5y +2pp 80.0% $11.32B −54.5% no
36 widened 5y +4pp 80.0% $11.48B −53.8% no
37 widened 5y +6pp 80.0% $11.68B −53.0% no
38 widened 5y +8pp 80.0% $11.95B −51.9% no
39 widened 5y +10pp 80.0% $12.27B −50.6% no
40 widened 5y +12pp 80.0% $12.67B −49.0% no
41 widened 5y +14pp 80.0% $13.15B −47.1% no
42 widened 5y +16pp 80.0% $13.72B −44.8% no
43 widened 5y +18pp 80.0% $14.40B −42.1% no
44 widened 5y +20pp 80.0% $15.18B −38.9% no

8 · Terminal value derivation

NOPAT_{N+1}         = NOPAT_{10} × (1 + g_terminal)
                    = $9.72B × (1 + 2.5%)
                    = $9.96B

ΔNOPAT              = NOPAT_{N+1} − NOPAT_{10}
                    = $242.9M
Reinvestment_{N+1}  = ΔNOPAT / ROIC_terminal
                    = $242.9M / 11.0%
                    = $2.21B

FCF_{N+1}           = NOPAT_{N+1} − Reinvestment_{N+1}
                    = $9.96B − $2.21B
                    = $7.75B

Terminal value (TV) = FCF_{N+1} / (WACC − g_terminal)
                    = $7.75B / (9.0% − 2.5%)
                    = $119.27B

PV(TV)              = TV / (1 + WACC)^10
                    = $119.27B / 2.367
                    = $50.38B
            

9 · Reconciliation check (DCF PV vs. the market)

This isn't a fair value — it's the inverse check. The solver built the scenario so that DCF PV reproduces the current enterprise value; if the normal bracket worked the delta below is ~0 by construction. A non-zero delta only appears when the solver fell through to the widened margin band.

Σ PV(FCF_1..10) = -$35.20B
+ PV(TV)          = $50.38B
= Enterprise value = $15.18B   (widened solve — may differ from EV target)
− Total debt      = $8.42B
+ Cash            = $130.0M
= Equity value    = $6.89B
÷ Diluted shares  = 610.8M
= DCF PV / share  = $11.29

Market price      = $27.13
Reconciliation Δ  = −58.4%   (widened band — residual gap the scenario could not close)
            
Open this scenario in the calculator →
Every input above is pre-filled; the calculator auto-runs and lets you override any assumption.

Every rule above — growth-source priority, plateau tiers, compound cap, solver ladder, flag colours — is documented on the expectations scenario methodology.

What these ratios mean & how they're built: see the valuation ratios glossary on the company-facts methodology page — per-ratio definitions and the exact us-gaap concepts behind each numerator and denominator.

Sources. Denominators come from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings for INVH (CIK 0001687229); analyst growth forecasts come from analyst consensus. Share price is the latest split-adjusted close from our daily history (live quote as fallback). Per-share denominators are split-adjusted to today's share count.