MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS INC (MPWR) valuation

Share price $1632.06 · Close 2026-04-24

Price-to-Earnings

P/E · Trailing Diluted
127.01×
P/E history →

Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow

P/FCF · Trailing
118.35×
P/FCF history →

Free-Cash-Flow Yield

FCF Yield · Trailing
0.84%
FCF Yield history →

Enterprise-Value-to-EBITDA

EV/EBITDA · Trailing
95.97×
EV/EBITDA history →

Price-to-Sales

P/S · Trailing
28.49×
P/S history →

Price-to-Book

P/B · Latest filing
22.51×
P/B history →

Expectations investing: what does the price imply?

Stress figure — scenario margin 80% above 3-yr max 26%

Rappaport-style reverse-DCF. We start from the current market price ($1632.06 × 48.7M shares = $79.50B market cap, $78.42B enterprise value) and solve for the operating path that would justify it.

To reconcile today's price with a plausible scenario, the model lands on:

  • Year-1 revenue growth: 41.6%
    Source is analyst consensus of 21.6%; the scenario bumped Y1 by +20.0pp and still needed the margin band widened — both levers are at stretch.
  • Target EBIT margin (Y10): 80.0%
    Scenario lands on 80.0%, above the historical band (3-yr range 24.4%–26.5%). The reconciliation needs a margin the filer has not shown.
  • High-growth plateau: 5 years
    Tier default for Y2 at 17.6%.

at or below the reference above the reference outside the historical band

Where the PV comes from
Y1–3
-4%
Y4–10
-26%
Terminal
+131%

Share of the total PV the model has assigned to each window. The further out a cash flow sits, the harder it is to estimate — so readers can weigh how much of the scenario rests on the near, plateau, and post-horizon periods.

Facts · FY2025 (2025-12-31)

Share price
$1632.06
Diluted shares
48.7M
Total debt
$24.1M
Cash & equivalents
$1.10B
Revenue
$2.79B
EBIT (GAAP)
$728.6M
EBIT margin (GAAP)
26.1%
Operating cash flow
$838.2M
CapEx
$172.0M
Observed YoY growth
26.4%
Analyst current-FY growth
21.6%
Analyst next-FY growth
17.6%
3-year revenue CAGR
15.9%

Assumptions

Initial revenue growth
21.6%
from analyst consensus
Year-2 growth
17.6%
from analyst next-FY consensus
Starting EBIT margin
26.1%
from latest FY EBIT margin (GAAP)
Tax rate
18.9%
from latest FY EffectiveTaxRate
Starting ROIC
24.1%
NOPAT₀ ÷ invested capital, capped at 40.0%

Constants

Horizon
10 years
WACC
9.0%
Terminal growth
2.5%
Terminal ROIC
11.0%

Yearly projection

Year Revenue Growth EBIT Margin NOPAT ROIC Reinvestment FCF Discount PV of FCF
1 $3.95B 41.6% $1.24B 31.5% $1.01B 22.8% $1.84B -$829.7M 0.917 -$761.2M
2 $5.44B 37.6% $2.01B 36.9% $1.63B 21.4% $2.88B -$1.25B 0.842 -$1.05B
3 $7.48B 37.6% $3.16B 42.3% $2.57B 20.1% $4.66B -$2.09B 0.772 -$1.62B
4 $10.29B 37.6% $4.91B 47.7% $3.98B 18.8% $7.51B -$3.53B 0.708 -$2.50B
5 $14.16B 37.6% $7.51B 53.1% $6.09B 17.5% $12.06B -$5.97B 0.650 -$3.88B
6 $18.49B 30.6% $10.81B 58.4% $8.77B 16.2% $16.47B -$7.70B 0.596 -$4.59B
7 $22.85B 23.6% $14.58B 63.8% $11.83B 14.9% $20.53B -$8.71B 0.547 -$4.76B
8 $26.62B 16.5% $18.43B 69.2% $14.95B 13.6% $22.92B -$7.97B 0.502 -$4.00B
9 $29.16B 9.5% $21.76B 74.6% $17.65B 12.3% $21.92B -$4.27B 0.460 -$1.97B
10 $29.89B 2.5% $23.91B 80.0% $19.39B 11.0% $15.89B $3.51B 0.422 $1.48B
Sum of PV of FCF (years 1-10) -$23.65B

Terminal value

NOPATN+1
$19.88B
ReinvestmentN+1
$4.41B
FCFN+1
$15.47B
Terminal value (undiscounted)
$238.01B
PV of terminal value
$100.54B
Gordon-growth: TV = FCFN+1 ÷ (WACC − g) = $15.47B ÷ (9.0% − 2.5%).

Equity bridge

PV of operating FCF -$23.65B
+ PV of terminal value $100.54B
= Enterprise value $76.89B
− Total debt $24.1M
+ Cash & equivalents $1.10B
= Equity value $77.96B
÷ Diluted shares 48.7M
= DCF PV / share $1600.59
Market price $1632.06
Reconciliation delta −1.9% (widened band)
Full calculation trail Click to expand — every number on this page derived step by step.

1 · Enterprise-value target (what the DCF must match)

Market cap   = price × diluted shares
             = $1632.06 × 48.7M
             = $79.50B

EV target    = market cap + total debt − cash & equivalents
             = $79.50B + $24.1M − $1.10B
             = $78.42B
            

2 · Starting NOPAT (base year 0)

GAAP EBIT          = $728.6M   (26.1% of revenue)
× (1 − tax rate)  = × (1 − 18.9%) = × 0.8111
= NOPAT₀            = $591.0M
            

3 · Invested capital & starting ROIC

Invested capital = total debt + book equity − cash
                 = $24.1M + $3.53B − $1.10B
                 = $2.46B

Raw ROIC₀        = NOPAT₀ / Invested capital
                 = $591.0M / $2.46B
                 = 24.1%
(no cap applied; raw value is within the 40.0% ceiling)
            

4 · Growth path construction

Source       = analyst consensus: Y1 = 21.6%, Y2 = 17.6%
Clamp        = [2.5%, 60%] (no sub-terminal or 60%+ starts)
Plateau rate = 17.6% (Y2 — held from year 2 through end of plateau)
Tier         = 5 years (rule: plateau rate < 15% → 3y, < 25% → 5y, else 7y)
Plateau      = 5 years
Fade         = linear from effective Y2 to terminal 2.5% across the remaining 5 years

Effective Y1 growth after solver bumps = 41.6%
Effective Y2 growth after solver bumps = 37.6%
Growth by year:
  Y1 = 41.6%
  Y2 = 37.6%
  Y3 = 37.6%
  Y4 = 37.6%
  Y5 = 37.6%
  Y6 = 30.6%
  Y7 = 23.6%
  Y8 = 16.5%
  Y9 = 9.5%
  Y10 = 2.5%
            

5 · Margin path construction

Starting margin (Y0) = 26.1%   (source: latest FY EBIT margin (GAAP))
Target margin (Y10)  = 80.0%   (solver output, widened band)
Year-t margin        = starting + (target − starting) × (t / 10)
Margin by year:
  Y1 = 31.5%
  Y2 = 36.9%
  Y3 = 42.3%
  Y4 = 47.7%
  Y5 = 53.1%
  Y6 = 58.4%
  Y7 = 63.8%
  Y8 = 69.2%
  Y9 = 74.6%
  Y10 = 80.0%
            

6 · ROIC path construction

The capex heuristic compares latest-period CapEx ($172.0M) against the Normalized CapEx (3-yr mean) of $125.2M — mean of the last three annual CapEx values. When the latest is above 1.4× that mean and CapEx is at least 5% of revenue, we treat the filer as capital-intensive and mid-investment, hold ROIC flat for a 5-year harvest phase, and only then fade to terminal ROIC. The 3-yr mean does not feed the DCF directly — it only gates this flag.

Capex-heuristic inactive (latest CapEx 1.37× the 3-yr mean of $125.2M — below the 1.4× / 5%-of-revenue gates).
Fade from Y1: ROIC_t = ROIC₀ + (ROIC_terminal − ROIC₀) × (t / 10)
ROIC₀ = 24.1%; ROIC_terminal = 11.0%

ROIC by year:
  Y1 = 22.8%
  Y2 = 21.4%
  Y3 = 20.1%
  Y4 = 18.8%
  Y5 = 17.5%
  Y6 = 16.2%
  Y7 = 14.9%
  Y8 = 13.6%
  Y9 = 12.3%
  Y10 = 11.0%
            

7 · Solver iterations

Each row is one bisection attempt. The solver sweeps Y1 growth bumps 0pp → +20pp across the plateau ladder inside the normal margin bracket, then — if nothing reconciles — repeats the same sweep in a widened margin band ([-10%, 80%]). The first feasible attempt is the one the page uses. If no combination reconciles, the page shows the attempt whose PV sits closest to the target EV so both levers are balanced.

# Phase Plateau Y1 bump Solved margin PV(EV) vs target Feasible?
1 normal 5y +0pp 31.3% $15.23B −80.6% no
2 normal 5y +2pp 31.3% $16.55B −78.9% no
3 normal 5y +4pp 31.3% $18.00B −77.1% no
4 normal 5y +6pp 31.3% $19.58B −75.0% no
5 normal 5y +8pp 31.3% $21.31B −72.8% no
6 normal 5y +10pp 31.3% $23.20B −70.4% no
7 normal 5y +12pp 31.3% $25.27B −67.8% no
8 normal 5y +14pp 31.3% $27.52B −64.9% no
9 normal 5y +16pp 31.3% $29.98B −61.8% no
10 normal 5y +18pp 31.3% $32.65B −58.4% no
11 normal 5y +20pp 31.3% $35.57B −54.6% no
12 normal 7y +0pp 31.3% $16.32B −79.2% no
13 normal 7y +2pp 31.3% $17.93B −77.1% no
14 normal 7y +4pp 31.3% $19.72B −74.9% no
15 normal 7y +6pp 31.3% $21.70B −72.3% no
16 normal 7y +8pp 31.3% $23.90B −69.5% no
17 normal 7y +10pp 31.3% $26.33B −66.4% no
18 normal 7y +12pp 31.3% $29.02B −63.0% no
19 normal 7y +14pp 31.3% $31.99B −59.2% no
20 normal 7y +16pp 31.3% $35.26B −55.0% no
21 normal 7y +18pp 31.3% $38.87B −50.4% no
22 normal 7y +20pp 31.3% $42.85B −45.4% no
23 widened 5y +0pp 80.0% $29.92B −61.9% no
24 widened 5y +2pp 80.0% $32.92B −58.0% no
25 widened 5y +4pp 80.0% $36.23B −53.8% no
26 widened 5y +6pp 80.0% $39.86B −49.2% no
27 widened 5y +8pp 80.0% $43.84B −44.1% no
28 widened 5y +10pp 80.0% $48.20B −38.5% no
29 widened 5y +12pp 80.0% $52.97B −32.5% no
30 widened 5y +14pp 80.0% $58.19B −25.8% no
31 widened 5y +16pp 80.0% $63.89B −18.5% no
32 widened 5y +18pp 80.0% $70.11B −10.6% no
33 widened 5y +20pp 80.0% $76.89B −2.0% yes ✓

8 · Terminal value derivation

NOPAT_{N+1}         = NOPAT_{10} × (1 + g_terminal)
                    = $19.39B × (1 + 2.5%)
                    = $19.88B

ΔNOPAT              = NOPAT_{N+1} − NOPAT_{10}
                    = $484.8M
Reinvestment_{N+1}  = ΔNOPAT / ROIC_terminal
                    = $484.8M / 11.0%
                    = $4.41B

FCF_{N+1}           = NOPAT_{N+1} − Reinvestment_{N+1}
                    = $19.88B − $4.41B
                    = $15.47B

Terminal value (TV) = FCF_{N+1} / (WACC − g_terminal)
                    = $15.47B / (9.0% − 2.5%)
                    = $238.01B

PV(TV)              = TV / (1 + WACC)^10
                    = $238.01B / 2.367
                    = $100.54B
            

9 · Reconciliation check (DCF PV vs. the market)

This isn't a fair value — it's the inverse check. The solver built the scenario so that DCF PV reproduces the current enterprise value; if the normal bracket worked the delta below is ~0 by construction. A non-zero delta only appears when the solver fell through to the widened margin band.

Σ PV(FCF_1..10) = -$23.65B
+ PV(TV)          = $100.54B
= Enterprise value = $76.89B   (widened solve — may differ from EV target)
− Total debt      = $24.1M
+ Cash            = $1.10B
= Equity value    = $77.96B
÷ Diluted shares  = 48.7M
= DCF PV / share  = $1600.59

Market price      = $1632.06
Reconciliation Δ  = −1.9%   (widened band — residual gap the scenario could not close)
            
Open this scenario in the calculator →
Every input above is pre-filled; the calculator auto-runs and lets you override any assumption.

Every rule above — growth-source priority, plateau tiers, compound cap, solver ladder, flag colours — is documented on the expectations scenario methodology.

What these ratios mean & how they're built: see the valuation ratios glossary on the company-facts methodology page — per-ratio definitions and the exact us-gaap concepts behind each numerator and denominator.

Sources. Denominators come from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings for MPWR (CIK 0001280452); analyst growth forecasts come from analyst consensus. Share price is the latest split-adjusted close from our daily history (live quote as fallback). Per-share denominators are split-adjusted to today's share count.