Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH) valuation

Share price $170.10 · Close 2026-04-24

Price-to-Earnings

P/E · Trailing Diluted
21.26×
P/E history →

Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow

P/FCF · Trailing
16.80×
P/FCF history →

Free-Cash-Flow Yield

FCF Yield · Trailing
5.95%
FCF Yield history →

Enterprise-Value-to-EBITDA

EV/EBITDA · Trailing
16.07×
EV/EBITDA history →

Price-to-Sales

P/S · Trailing
2.98×
P/S history →

Price-to-Book

P/B · Latest filing
5.54×
P/B history →

Expectations investing: what does the price imply?

Growth stretched +18pp above source

Rappaport-style reverse-DCF. We start from the current market price ($170.10 × 482.0M shares = $81.99B market cap, $101.78B enterprise value) and solve for the operating path that would justify it.

To reconcile today's price with a plausible scenario, the model lands on:

  • Year-1 revenue growth: 20.8%
    Source is analyst consensus (absolute forecast, TTM-anchored) of 2.8%; the scenario bumped Y1 by +18.0pp to reconcile.
  • Target EBIT margin (Y10): 27.0%
    Scenario lands above the 3-yr max of 23.8% (starting 21.7%, ending 27.0%).
  • High-growth plateau: 3 years
    Tier default for Y2 at 4.9%.

at or below the reference above the reference outside the historical band

Where the PV comes from
Y1–3
-10%
Y4–10
+1%
Terminal
+109%

Share of the total PV the model has assigned to each window. The further out a cash flow sits, the harder it is to estimate — so readers can weigh how much of the scenario rests on the near, plateau, and post-horizon periods.

Facts · TTM as of 2026-03-31 (Q12026)

Share price
$170.10
Diluted shares
482.0M
Total debt
$21.40B
Cash & equivalents
$1.61B
Revenue
$27.52B
EBIT (GAAP)
$5.97B
EBIT margin (GAAP)
21.7%
Operating cash flow
$5.23B
CapEx
$298.0M
Observed YoY growth
9.9%
Analyst current-FY growth
4.8%
Analyst next-FY growth
4.9%
3-year revenue CAGR
9.9%

Assumptions

Initial revenue growth
2.8%
from analyst consensus (absolute forecast, TTM-anchored)
(analyst FY-over-FY consensus: 4.8% — shown effective rate normalises it against our TTM base, which spans the current FY partway)
Year-2 growth
4.9%
from analyst next-FY consensus
Starting EBIT margin
21.7%
from latest FY EBIT margin (GAAP)
Tax rate
24.4%
from 3-year median of EffectiveTaxRate
Starting ROIC
13.1%
NOPAT₀ ÷ invested capital, capped at 40.0%

Constants

Horizon
10 years
WACC
9.0%
Terminal growth
2.5%
Terminal ROIC
11.0%

Yearly projection

Year Revenue Growth EBIT Margin NOPAT ROIC Reinvestment FCF Discount PV of FCF
1 $33.23B 20.8% $7.39B 22.2% $5.59B 12.9% $8.34B -$2.75B 0.917 -$2.52B
2 $40.85B 22.9% $9.30B 22.8% $7.04B 12.6% $11.43B -$4.40B 0.842 -$3.70B
3 $50.22B 22.9% $11.70B 23.3% $8.85B 12.4% $14.59B -$5.74B 0.772 -$4.43B
4 $60.27B 20.0% $14.36B 23.8% $10.86B 12.2% $16.46B -$5.59B 0.708 -$3.96B
5 $70.57B 17.1% $17.19B 24.4% $13.01B 12.0% $17.80B -$4.79B 0.650 -$3.12B
6 $80.58B 14.2% $20.06B 24.9% $15.17B 11.8% $18.33B -$3.16B 0.596 -$1.88B
7 $89.65B 11.3% $22.79B 25.4% $17.24B 11.6% $17.81B -$563.9M 0.547 -$308.5M
8 $97.12B 8.3% $25.21B 26.0% $19.07B 11.4% $16.02B $3.05B 0.502 $1.53B
9 $102.38B 5.4% $27.12B 26.5% $20.52B 11.2% $12.90B $7.62B 0.460 $3.51B
10 $104.94B 2.5% $28.36B 27.0% $21.45B 11.0% $8.50B $12.95B 0.422 $5.47B
Sum of PV of FCF (years 1-10) -$9.42B

Terminal value

NOPATN+1
$21.99B
ReinvestmentN+1
$4.88B
FCFN+1
$17.11B
Terminal value (undiscounted)
$263.26B
PV of terminal value
$111.20B
Gordon-growth: TV = FCFN+1 ÷ (WACC − g) = $17.11B ÷ (9.0% − 2.5%).

Equity bridge

PV of operating FCF -$9.42B
+ PV of terminal value $111.20B
= Enterprise value $101.78B
− Total debt $21.40B
+ Cash & equivalents $1.61B
= Equity value $81.99B
÷ Diluted shares 482.0M
= DCF PV / share $170.10
Market price $170.10
Reconciliation delta +0.0% (≈ 0 by construction)
Full calculation trail Click to expand — every number on this page derived step by step.

0 · TTM reconstruction (anchor: Q12026, 2026-03-31)

The latest filing is a 10-Q, so "base year" revenue / EBIT / OCF / CapEx are reconstructed as trailing-twelve-month values. Per-quarter facts (typical for income-statement items) get summed across four quarters; YTD-cumulative facts (typical for cash-flow items) use prior FY + YTDnow − YTDprior year same quarter.

Revenue
Sum of the four most recent per-quarter values
  • Q1 FY26 (2026-03-31): $7.60B
  • Q4 FY25 (2025-12-31): $6.59B
  • Q3 FY25 (2025-09-30): $6.35B
  • Q2 FY25 (2025-06-30): $6.97B
  • = $27.52B
EBIT
Sum of the four most recent per-quarter values
  • Q1 FY26 (2026-03-31): $1.75B
  • Q4 FY25 (2025-12-31): $1.22B
  • Q3 FY25 (2025-09-30): $1.17B
  • Q2 FY25 (2025-06-30): $1.83B
  • = $5.97B
OCF
Prior FY + current-quarter YTD − same-quarter-prior-year YTD
  • FY FY25 (2025-12-31): +$5.29B
  • Q1 FY26 (2026-03-31) YTD: +-$688.0M
  • Q1 FY25 (2025-03-31) YTD: −-$622.0M
  • = $5.23B
CapEx
Prior FY + current-quarter YTD − same-quarter-prior-year YTD
  • FY FY25 (2025-12-31): +$291.0M
  • Q1 FY26 (2026-03-31) YTD: +$62.0M
  • Q1 FY25 (2025-03-31) YTD: −$55.0M
  • = $298.0M
Prior-year TTM revenue (growth-calc baseline)
Sum of the four most recent per-quarter values
  • Q1 FY25 (2025-03-31): $7.06B
  • Q4 FY24 (2024-12-31): $6.07B
  • Q3 FY24 (2024-09-30): $5.70B
  • Q2 FY24 (2024-06-30): $6.22B
  • = $25.05B

1 · Enterprise-value target (what the DCF must match)

Market cap   = price × diluted shares
             = $170.10 × 482.0M
             = $81.99B

EV target    = market cap + total debt − cash & equivalents
             = $81.99B + $21.40B − $1.61B
             = $101.78B
            

2 · Starting NOPAT (base year 0)

GAAP EBIT          = $5.97B   (21.7% of revenue)
× (1 − tax rate)  = × (1 − 24.4%) = × 0.7565
= NOPAT₀            = $4.52B
            

3 · Invested capital & starting ROIC

Invested capital = total debt + book equity − cash
                 = $21.40B + $14.81B − $1.61B
                 = $34.60B

Raw ROIC₀        = NOPAT₀ / Invested capital
                 = $4.52B / $34.60B
                 = 13.1%
(no cap applied; raw value is within the 40.0% ceiling)
            

4 · Growth path construction

Source       = analyst consensus (absolute forecast, TTM-anchored): Y1 = 2.8%, Y2 = 4.9%
Clamp        = [2.5%, 60%] (no sub-terminal or 60%+ starts)
Plateau rate = 4.9% (Y2 — held from year 2 through end of plateau)
Tier         = 3 years (rule: plateau rate < 15% → 3y, < 25% → 5y, else 7y)
Plateau      = 3 years
Fade         = linear from effective Y2 to terminal 2.5% across the remaining 7 years

Effective Y1 growth after solver bumps = 20.8%
Effective Y2 growth after solver bumps = 22.9%
Growth by year:
  Y1 = 20.8%
  Y2 = 22.9%
  Y3 = 22.9%
  Y4 = 20.0%
  Y5 = 17.1%
  Y6 = 14.2%
  Y7 = 11.3%
  Y8 = 8.3%
  Y9 = 5.4%
  Y10 = 2.5%
            

5 · Margin path construction

Starting margin (Y0) = 21.7%   (source: latest FY EBIT margin (GAAP))
Target margin (Y10)  = 27.0%   (solver output, normal band)
Year-t margin        = starting + (target − starting) × (t / 10)
Margin by year:
  Y1 = 22.2%
  Y2 = 22.8%
  Y3 = 23.3%
  Y4 = 23.8%
  Y5 = 24.4%
  Y6 = 24.9%
  Y7 = 25.4%
  Y8 = 26.0%
  Y9 = 26.5%
  Y10 = 27.0%
            

6 · ROIC path construction

The capex heuristic compares latest-period CapEx ($298.0M) against the Normalized CapEx (3-yr mean) of $341.0M — mean of the last three annual CapEx values. When the latest is above 1.4× that mean and CapEx is at least 5% of revenue, we treat the filer as capital-intensive and mid-investment, hold ROIC flat for a 5-year harvest phase, and only then fade to terminal ROIC. The 3-yr mean does not feed the DCF directly — it only gates this flag.

Capex-heuristic inactive (latest CapEx 0.87× the 3-yr mean of $341.0M — below the 1.4× / 5%-of-revenue gates).
Fade from Y1: ROIC_t = ROIC₀ + (ROIC_terminal − ROIC₀) × (t / 10)
ROIC₀ = 13.1%; ROIC_terminal = 11.0%

ROIC by year:
  Y1 = 12.9%
  Y2 = 12.6%
  Y3 = 12.4%
  Y4 = 12.2%
  Y5 = 12.0%
  Y6 = 11.8%
  Y7 = 11.6%
  Y8 = 11.4%
  Y9 = 11.2%
  Y10 = 11.0%
            

7 · Solver iterations

Each row is one bisection attempt. The solver sweeps Y1 growth bumps 0pp → +20pp across the plateau ladder inside the normal margin bracket, then — if nothing reconciles — repeats the same sweep in a widened margin band ([-10%, 80%]). The first feasible attempt is the one the page uses. If no combination reconciles, the page shows the attempt whose PV sits closest to the target EV so both levers are balanced.

# Phase Plateau Y1 bump Solved margin PV(EV) vs target Feasible?
1 normal 3y +0pp 27.4% $63.05B −38.0% no
2 normal 3y +2pp 27.4% $66.09B −35.1% no
3 normal 3y +4pp 27.4% $69.41B −31.8% no
4 normal 3y +6pp 27.4% $73.03B −28.2% no
5 normal 3y +8pp 27.4% $76.97B −24.4% no
6 normal 3y +10pp 27.4% $81.26B −20.2% no
7 normal 3y +12pp 27.4% $85.93B −15.6% no
8 normal 3y +14pp 27.4% $90.99B −10.6% no
9 normal 3y +16pp 27.4% $96.50B −5.2% no
10 normal 3y +18pp 27.0% $101.78B +0.0% yes ✓

8 · Terminal value derivation

NOPAT_{N+1}         = NOPAT_{10} × (1 + g_terminal)
                    = $21.45B × (1 + 2.5%)
                    = $21.99B

ΔNOPAT              = NOPAT_{N+1} − NOPAT_{10}
                    = $536.3M
Reinvestment_{N+1}  = ΔNOPAT / ROIC_terminal
                    = $536.3M / 11.0%
                    = $4.88B

FCF_{N+1}           = NOPAT_{N+1} − Reinvestment_{N+1}
                    = $21.99B − $4.88B
                    = $17.11B

Terminal value (TV) = FCF_{N+1} / (WACC − g_terminal)
                    = $17.11B / (9.0% − 2.5%)
                    = $263.26B

PV(TV)              = TV / (1 + WACC)^10
                    = $263.26B / 2.367
                    = $111.20B
            

9 · Reconciliation check (DCF PV vs. the market)

This isn't a fair value — it's the inverse check. The solver built the scenario so that DCF PV reproduces the current enterprise value; if the normal bracket worked the delta below is ~0 by construction. A non-zero delta only appears when the solver fell through to the widened margin band.

Σ PV(FCF_1..10) = -$9.42B
+ PV(TV)          = $111.20B
= Enterprise value = $101.78B   (≈ EV target $101.78B by construction)
− Total debt      = $21.40B
+ Cash            = $1.61B
= Equity value    = $81.99B
÷ Diluted shares  = 482.0M
= DCF PV / share  = $170.10

Market price      = $170.10
Reconciliation Δ  = +0.0%   (≈ 0 by construction — the solver anchored on this price)
            
Open this scenario in the calculator →
Every input above is pre-filled; the calculator auto-runs and lets you override any assumption.

Every rule above — growth-source priority, plateau tiers, compound cap, solver ladder, flag colours — is documented on the expectations scenario methodology.

What these ratios mean & how they're built: see the valuation ratios glossary on the company-facts methodology page — per-ratio definitions and the exact us-gaap concepts behind each numerator and denominator.

Sources. Denominators come from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings for MRSH (CIK 0000062709); analyst growth forecasts come from analyst consensus. Share price is the latest split-adjusted close from our daily history (live quote as fallback). Per-share denominators are split-adjusted to today's share count.