Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) valuation

Share price $143.09 · Close 2026-04-24

Price-to-Earnings

P/E · Trailing Diluted
230.79×
P/E history →

Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow

P/FCF · Trailing
174.73×
P/FCF history →

Free-Cash-Flow Yield

FCF Yield · Trailing
0.57%
FCF Yield history →

Enterprise-Value-to-EBITDA

EV/EBITDA · Trailing
233.55×
EV/EBITDA history →

Price-to-Sales

P/S · Trailing
76.45×
P/S history →

Price-to-Book

P/B · Latest filing
46.32×
P/B history →

Expectations investing: what does the price imply?

Stress figure — scenario margin 78% above 3-yr max 32%

Rappaport-style reverse-DCF. We start from the current market price ($143.09 × 2.39B shares = $342.16B market cap, $340.96B enterprise value) and solve for the operating path that would justify it.

To reconcile today's price with a plausible scenario, the model lands on:

  • Year-1 revenue growth: 60.0%
    Held at the analyst consensus of 60.0% — the margin lever absorbs the reconciliation.
  • Target EBIT margin (Y10): 78.2%
    Scenario lands on 78.2%, above the historical band (3-yr range 5.4%–31.6%). The reconciliation needs a margin the filer has not shown.
  • High-growth plateau: 6 years
    Trimmed from the 7-year Y2-tier default to 6 by the 10× compound cap — 43.0% for 6y still lifts revenue ~9.6× over base.

at or below the reference above the reference outside the historical band

Where the PV comes from
Y1–3
-3%
Y4–10
-55%
Terminal
+158%

Share of the total PV the model has assigned to each window. The further out a cash flow sits, the harder it is to estimate — so readers can weigh how much of the scenario rests on the near, plateau, and post-horizon periods.

Facts · FY2025 (2025-12-31)

Share price
$143.09
Diluted shares
2.39B
Total debt
$229.3M
Cash & equivalents
$1.42B
Revenue
$4.48B
EBIT (GAAP)
$1.41B
EBIT margin (GAAP)
31.6%
Operating cash flow
$2.13B
CapEx
$33.9M
Observed YoY growth
56.2%
Analyst current-FY growth
62.4%
Analyst next-FY growth
43.0%
3-year revenue CAGR
32.9%

Assumptions

Initial revenue growth
60.0%
from analyst consensus
Year-2 growth
43.0%
from analyst next-FY consensus
Starting EBIT margin
15.9%
from 3-year mean EBIT margin (latest FY deviates > 5pp)
Tax rate
4.3%
from 3-year median of EffectiveTaxRate
Starting ROIC
21.8%
NOPAT₀ ÷ invested capital, capped at 40.0%

Constants

Horizon
10 years
WACC
9.0%
Terminal growth
2.5%
Terminal ROIC
11.0%

Yearly projection

Year Revenue Growth EBIT Margin NOPAT ROIC Reinvestment FCF Discount PV of FCF
1 $7.16B 60.0% $1.59B 22.2% $1.52B 20.8% $798.2M $720.0M 0.917 $660.6M
2 $11.10B 55.0% $3.15B 28.4% $3.01B 19.7% $7.61B -$4.59B 0.842 -$3.86B
3 $17.20B 55.0% $5.96B 34.6% $5.70B 18.6% $14.43B -$8.73B 0.772 -$6.74B
4 $26.67B 55.0% $10.89B 40.8% $10.42B 17.5% $26.97B -$16.56B 0.708 -$11.73B
5 $41.34B 55.0% $19.46B 47.1% $18.61B 16.4% $49.89B -$31.28B 0.650 -$20.33B
6 $64.07B 55.0% $34.15B 53.3% $32.66B 15.3% $91.63B -$58.97B 0.596 -$35.16B
7 $90.90B 41.9% $54.11B 59.5% $51.76B 14.3% $133.96B -$82.21B 0.547 -$44.97B
8 $117.04B 28.8% $76.95B 65.7% $73.61B 13.2% $165.94B -$92.33B 0.502 -$46.34B
9 $135.33B 15.6% $97.40B 72.0% $93.17B 12.1% $161.88B -$68.71B 0.460 -$31.64B
10 $138.71B 2.5% $108.47B 78.2% $103.76B 11.0% $96.28B $7.48B 0.422 $3.16B
Sum of PV of FCF (years 1-10) -$196.95B

Terminal value

NOPATN+1
$106.36B
ReinvestmentN+1
$23.58B
FCFN+1
$82.77B
Terminal value (undiscounted)
$1.27T
PV of terminal value
$537.91B
Gordon-growth: TV = FCFN+1 ÷ (WACC − g) = $82.77B ÷ (9.0% − 2.5%).

Equity bridge

PV of operating FCF -$196.95B
+ PV of terminal value $537.91B
= Enterprise value $340.96B
− Total debt $229.3M
+ Cash & equivalents $1.42B
= Equity value $342.16B
÷ Diluted shares 2.39B
= DCF PV / share $143.09
Market price $143.09
Reconciliation delta −0.0% (widened band)
Full calculation trail Click to expand — every number on this page derived step by step.

1 · Enterprise-value target (what the DCF must match)

Market cap   = price × diluted shares
             = $143.09 × 2.39B
             = $342.16B

EV target    = market cap + total debt − cash & equivalents
             = $342.16B + $229.3M − $1.42B
             = $340.96B
            

2 · Starting NOPAT (base year 0)

GAAP EBIT          = $1.41B   (31.6% of revenue)
× (1 − tax rate)  = × (1 − 4.3%) = × 0.9565
= NOPAT₀            = $1.35B
            

3 · Invested capital & starting ROIC

Invested capital = total debt + book equity − cash
                 = $229.3M + $7.39B − $1.42B
                 = $6.19B

Raw ROIC₀        = NOPAT₀ / Invested capital
                 = $1.35B / $6.19B
                 = 21.8%
(no cap applied; raw value is within the 40.0% ceiling)
            

4 · Growth path construction

Source       = analyst consensus: Y1 = 60.0%, Y2 = 43.0%
Clamp        = [2.5%, 60%] (no sub-terminal or 60%+ starts)
Plateau rate = 43.0% (Y2 — held from year 2 through end of plateau)
Tier         = 7 years (rule: plateau rate < 15% → 3y, < 25% → 5y, else 7y)
Cap trim     = 6 years (compound cap: Y1 × plateau_rate^(n−1) ≤ 10× base)
Plateau      = 6 years
Fade         = linear from effective Y2 to terminal 2.5% across the remaining 4 years

Effective Y1 growth after solver bumps = 60.0%
Effective Y2 growth after solver bumps = 43.0%
Growth by year:
  Y1 = 60.0%
  Y2 = 55.0%
  Y3 = 55.0%
  Y4 = 55.0%
  Y5 = 55.0%
  Y6 = 55.0%
  Y7 = 41.9%
  Y8 = 28.8%
  Y9 = 15.6%
  Y10 = 2.5%
            

5 · Margin path construction

Starting margin (Y0) = 15.9%   (source: 3-year mean EBIT margin (latest FY deviates > 5pp))
Target margin (Y10)  = 78.2%   (solver output, widened band)
Year-t margin        = starting + (target − starting) × (t / 10)
Margin by year:
  Y1 = 22.2%
  Y2 = 28.4%
  Y3 = 34.6%
  Y4 = 40.8%
  Y5 = 47.1%
  Y6 = 53.3%
  Y7 = 59.5%
  Y8 = 65.7%
  Y9 = 72.0%
  Y10 = 78.2%
            

6 · ROIC path construction

The capex heuristic compares latest-period CapEx ($33.9M) against the Normalized CapEx (3-yr mean) of $20.5M — mean of the last three annual CapEx values. When the latest is above 1.4× that mean and CapEx is at least 5% of revenue, we treat the filer as capital-intensive and mid-investment, hold ROIC flat for a 5-year harvest phase, and only then fade to terminal ROIC. The 3-yr mean does not feed the DCF directly — it only gates this flag.

Capex-heuristic inactive (latest CapEx 1.65× the 3-yr mean of $20.5M — below the 1.4× / 5%-of-revenue gates).
Fade from Y1: ROIC_t = ROIC₀ + (ROIC_terminal − ROIC₀) × (t / 10)
ROIC₀ = 21.8%; ROIC_terminal = 11.0%

ROIC by year:
  Y1 = 20.8%
  Y2 = 19.7%
  Y3 = 18.6%
  Y4 = 17.5%
  Y5 = 16.4%
  Y6 = 15.3%
  Y7 = 14.3%
  Y8 = 13.2%
  Y9 = 12.1%
  Y10 = 11.0%
            

7 · Solver iterations

Each row is one bisection attempt. The solver sweeps Y1 growth bumps 0pp → +20pp across the plateau ladder inside the normal margin bracket, then — if nothing reconciles — repeats the same sweep in a widened margin band ([-10%, 80%]). The first feasible attempt is the one the page uses. If no combination reconciles, the page shows the attempt whose PV sits closest to the target EV so both levers are balanced.

# Phase Plateau Y1 bump Solved margin PV(EV) vs target Feasible?
1 normal 6y +0pp 36.3% $105.01B −69.2% no
2 normal 6y +2pp 36.3% $113.71B −66.7% no
3 normal 6y +4pp 36.3% $123.08B −63.9% no
4 normal 6y +6pp 36.3% $133.18B −60.9% no
5 normal 6y +8pp 36.3% $144.04B −57.8% no
6 normal 6y +10pp 36.3% $155.71B −54.3% no
7 normal 6y +12pp 36.3% $168.26B −50.7% no
8 normal 6y +14pp 36.3% $181.72B −46.7% no
9 normal 6y +16pp 36.3% $196.16B −42.5% no
10 normal 6y +18pp 36.3% $203.74B −40.2% no
11 normal 6y +20pp 36.3% $203.74B −40.2% no
12 normal 7y +0pp 36.3% $117.65B −65.5% no
13 normal 7y +2pp 36.3% $128.15B −62.4% no
14 normal 7y +4pp 36.3% $139.53B −59.1% no
15 normal 7y +6pp 36.3% $151.84B −55.5% no
16 normal 7y +8pp 36.3% $165.16B −51.6% no
17 normal 7y +10pp 36.3% $179.55B −47.3% no
18 normal 7y +12pp 36.3% $195.09B −42.8% no
19 normal 7y +14pp 36.3% $211.86B −37.9% no
20 normal 7y +16pp 36.3% $229.93B −32.6% no
21 normal 7y +18pp 36.3% $239.45B −29.8% no
22 normal 7y +20pp 36.3% $239.45B −29.8% no
23 widened 6y +0pp 80.0% $213.61B −37.4% no
24 widened 6y +2pp 80.0% $232.11B −31.9% no
25 widened 6y +4pp 80.0% $252.07B −26.1% no
26 widened 6y +6pp 80.0% $273.57B −19.8% no
27 widened 6y +8pp 80.0% $296.71B −13.0% no
28 widened 6y +10pp 80.0% $321.60B −5.7% no
29 widened 6y +12pp 78.2% $340.96B −0.0% yes ✓

8 · Terminal value derivation

NOPAT_{N+1}         = NOPAT_{10} × (1 + g_terminal)
                    = $103.76B × (1 + 2.5%)
                    = $106.36B

ΔNOPAT              = NOPAT_{N+1} − NOPAT_{10}
                    = $2.59B
Reinvestment_{N+1}  = ΔNOPAT / ROIC_terminal
                    = $2.59B / 11.0%
                    = $23.58B

FCF_{N+1}           = NOPAT_{N+1} − Reinvestment_{N+1}
                    = $106.36B − $23.58B
                    = $82.77B

Terminal value (TV) = FCF_{N+1} / (WACC − g_terminal)
                    = $82.77B / (9.0% − 2.5%)
                    = $1.27T

PV(TV)              = TV / (1 + WACC)^10
                    = $1.27T / 2.367
                    = $537.91B
            

9 · Reconciliation check (DCF PV vs. the market)

This isn't a fair value — it's the inverse check. The solver built the scenario so that DCF PV reproduces the current enterprise value; if the normal bracket worked the delta below is ~0 by construction. A non-zero delta only appears when the solver fell through to the widened margin band.

Σ PV(FCF_1..10) = -$196.95B
+ PV(TV)          = $537.91B
= Enterprise value = $340.96B   (widened solve — may differ from EV target)
− Total debt      = $229.3M
+ Cash            = $1.42B
= Equity value    = $342.16B
÷ Diluted shares  = 2.39B
= DCF PV / share  = $143.09

Market price      = $143.09
Reconciliation Δ  = −0.0%   (widened band — residual gap the scenario could not close)
            
Open this scenario in the calculator →
Every input above is pre-filled; the calculator auto-runs and lets you override any assumption.

Every rule above — growth-source priority, plateau tiers, compound cap, solver ladder, flag colours — is documented on the expectations scenario methodology.

What these ratios mean & how they're built: see the valuation ratios glossary on the company-facts methodology page — per-ratio definitions and the exact us-gaap concepts behind each numerator and denominator.

Sources. Denominators come from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings for PLTR (CIK 0001321655); analyst growth forecasts come from analyst consensus. Share price is the latest split-adjusted close from our daily history (live quote as fallback). Per-share denominators are split-adjusted to today's share count.