CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) valuation

Share price $77.47 · As of last filing 2026-03-31

Price-to-Earnings

P/E · Trailing Diluted
-24.52×
P/E history →

Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow

P/FCF · Trailing
-3.82×
P/FCF history →

Free-Cash-Flow Yield

FCF Yield · Trailing
-26.15%
FCF Yield history →

Enterprise-Value-to-EBITDA

EV/EBITDA · Trailing
24.61×
EV/EBITDA history →

Price-to-Sales

P/S · Trailing
6.56×
P/S history →

Price-to-Book

P/B · Latest filing
8.58×
P/B history →

Earning Power Value & reverse-DCF

Not investment advice. Both models below are mechanical algorithms — they don't account for any business-, industry-, or situation-specific context (management changes, regulatory shifts, segment mix, accounting one-offs beyond what XBRL tagging captures, etc.). Neither number is a forecast, a price target, or a suggestion to buy or sell any stock. They are starting points for further analysis, not conclusions.
A note on share counts — three different denominators in play
XBRL exposes three different share figures, and each is the right denominator for a different question:
  • Weighted-average diluted — the filed P/E denominator (NetIncome ÷ this = diluted EPS). Used on the P/E card above because EPS is pulled directly from the EarningsPerShareDiluted XBRL tag and is locked to that share count.
  • Point-in-time CSO (latest CommonStockSharesOutstanding) — matches a point-in-time price for market-cap-based multiples (P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA, P/FCF, FCF Yield) and the WACC equity weight. Cards labelled "shares outstanding" use this.
  • TSM-scaled diluted — point-in-time CSO scaled by the latest filer-disclosed (WeightedAverageDiluted ÷ WeightedAverageBasic) ratio. Estimates today's fully-diluted share count and is the denominator for the EPV per share and the reverse-DCF equity bridge below.
The three counts drift apart for high-buyback filers; the methodology diluted-shares note walks through which one fits which context and why.

Earning Power Value

Bruce Greenwald's no-growth fair-value floor: capitalise after-tax operating earnings (NOPAT) at the cost of capital (WACC), then bridge to equity (+ excess cash, − total debt, − minority interest). Assumes today's earnings approximate steady-state earnings power and ignores any growth premium. See the EPV methodology for assumptions and caveats.

EPV per share
-$61.58
3-yr avg EBIT margin
3.30%
× Revenue (3-yr FY median)
$1.92B
= Normalized EBIT
$63.3M
× (1 − tax)
0.7900
= NOPAT
$50.0M
÷ WACC
9.00%
= Enterprise EPV
$555.2M
+ Excess cash
$2.14B
− Total debt
$35.15B
− Minority interest
$0
= Equity EPV
-$32.45B
÷ Diluted shares
527.0M

Adjusted variant only: growth CapEx ($13.44B) currently exceeds Normalized NOPAT ($50.0M), so Earnings Power under the "less growth CapEx" framing is negative and the Adjusted EPV is undefined. The Normalized variant (-$61.58 per share) stays usable as the no-growth floor. Latest CapEx is 2.27× the 3-yr mean — if you read the spike as a finite buildout cycle, the Open EPV with 3-yr mean CapEx button below swaps TTM CapEx for the mid-cycle proxy and produces a positive Adjusted EPV.


EPV full calculation trail Click to expand — every number above derived step by step.

1 · Starting EBIT (TTM)

GAAP operating income from the trailing-twelve-month window ending 2026-03-31 (10-Q anchor — values reconstructed from quarterly facts). Concept: us-gaap: OperatingIncomeLoss


Method: Sum of the four most recent per-quarter values
  Q1 FY26 (2026-03-31): -$144.0M
  Q4 FY25 (2025-12-31): -$89.6M
  Q3 FY25 (2025-09-30): $51.9M
  Q2 FY25 (2025-06-30): $19.2M
= TTM EBIT = -$162.5M
                  

2 · Tax rate derivation

Source: 21% US statutory default (fewer than 2 of the last 3 FYs had a positive effective rate — likely NOL utilisation or one-time items). See the tax-rate methodology for the full precedence ladder (3-yr median → 2-yr mean → latest FY → REIT-zero → US-statutory default).

Tax rate = 21.0%
                

3 · Normalized NOPAT

Greenwald's textbook EPV normalises both inputs so a single cyclical or one-time-charge year doesn't whipsaw the floor. Margin anchor: when the filer has at least 8 years of FY EBIT-margin history, the 10-90% trimmed median of every FY observation is preferred — it drops the top and bottom decile so a single boom (COVID supply shock, regulatory one-off) or bust year doesn't anchor the floor. Filers with thinner history fall back to the 3-yr FY mean. Revenue follows a backward-looking ladder: 3-yr FY median → 2-yr FY mean → 1-yr FY → TTM fallback. Analyst forecasts are intentionally excluded — the reverse-DCF below is where forward numbers live, except on filers where the TTM EBIT window carried a material whole-segment disposition gain (the FY revenue base then pre-dates the divestiture and overstates the go-forward business — analyst forward FY consensus is preferred, with TTM as a last fallback). The symmetric case fires for partial-period acquisitions: when an FY in the sampled window carries a filer-disclosed pro-forma revenue tag (BusinessAcquisitionsProFormaRevenue) materially higher than reported, the pro-forma value substitutes into the median/mean so the anchor reflects full-period ownership of the acquired entity. See the EPV methodology for the full recipe.


3-yr FY EBIT margins = mean 3.30%, range [-6.11%, 16.92%]
TTM EBIT margin      = -2.61%

3-yr FY revenue history:
  FY2025 = $5.13B   ← median
  FY2025 = $1.92B   ← median
  FY2025 = $229.0M   ← median
Revenue (3-yr FY median) = $1.92B (FY2025)

Normalized EBIT = mean(3-yr margin) × normalisation revenue
                = 3.30% × $1.92B
                = $63.3M

NOPAT = Normalized EBIT × (1 − tax rate)
      = $63.3M × 0.7900
      = $50.0M
                        

4 · Growth CapEx (capex-adjusted variant)

Greenwald's maintenance-CapEx ≈ D&A heuristic. Floored at zero so a filer with CapEx < D&A doesn't get a "negative growth CapEx" bonus added back to NOPAT — that excess D&A is already-paid wear, not earnings. See the EPV methodology .

Latest CapEx is 2.27× the 3-yr mean ($7.32B). The growth-CapEx deduction below treats this single year of elevated investment as steady-state — capitalising it in perpetuity at 1/WACC. If you believe the spike is a finite buildout cycle, the $7.32B mid-cycle CapEx is the more honest maintenance proxy; the calculator link below lets you swap ttm_capex for that value to see the smoothed Adjusted EPV.

TTM CapEx — Prior FY + current-quarter YTD − same-quarter-prior-year YTD
  FY FY25 (2025-12-31): +$10.31B
  Q1 FY26 (2026-03-31) YTD: +$7.70B
  Q1 FY25 (2025-03-31) YTD: −$1.41B
= $16.60B
                      

TTM D&A — Prior FY + current-quarter YTD − same-quarter-prior-year YTD
  FY FY25 (2025-12-31): +$2.45B
  Q1 FY26 (2026-03-31) YTD: +$1.15B
  Q1 FY25 (2025-03-31) YTD: −$443.0M
= $3.16B
                      

TTM SBC — Prior FY + current-quarter YTD − same-quarter-prior-year YTD
  FY FY25 (2025-12-31): +$630.0M
  Q1 FY26 (2026-03-31) YTD: +$153.0M
  Q1 FY25 (2025-03-31) YTD: −$184.0M
= $599.0M
                      
Growth CapEx = max(0, TTM CapEx − TTM D&A)
             = max(0, $16.60B − $3.16B)
             = $13.44B

Adjusted NOPAT = Normalized NOPAT − Growth CapEx
              = $50.0M − $13.44B
              = -$13.39B
                    

5 · Capitalisation rate (WACC)

WACC = 9.0%   (default — β / Rf / ERP unavailable for this filer)
                  

6 · Enterprise EPV

Enterprise EPV (normalized) = NOPAT ÷ WACC
                            = $50.0M ÷ 9.0%
                            = $555.2M

Enterprise EPV (adjusted)   = (NOPAT − Growth CapEx) ÷ WACC
                            = -$13.39B ÷ 9.0%
                            = —
                

7 · Equity bridge

Same balance-sheet adjustments as the reverse-DCF: add the excess (non-operating) cash an acquirer would pocket at close, subtract the debt that has senior claim on enterprise value, and subtract the noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries that doesn't accrue to common shareholders. See the balance-sheet aggregates methodology for the exact concept chains.

Enterprise EPV   = $555.2M
+ Excess cash    = $2.14B   (after 2%-TTM-revenue operating-cash floor)
− Total debt     = $35.15B
− NCI            = $0
= Equity EPV     = -$32.45B

Adjusted Equity EPV = — + $2.14B − $35.15B − $0
                    = —
                

8 · Per share & vs market price

Diluted shares         = 527.0M
EPV / share (normalized) = -32.45B ÷ 527.0M shares
                       = -$61.58
EPV / share (adj.)     = —

Market price           = $77.47
Premium vs price       = (EPV/share − market) ÷ market
                       = −179.5%   (normalized), —   (adjusted)
                

Open this EPV in the calculator → Open EPV with 3-yr mean CapEx →
Every input above is pre-filled; the calculator auto-runs and lets you override any assumption.

Expectations investing: what does the price imply?

Alternative framing — margin held flat. If margin stayed at TTM 3.0% across the full 10-year horizon (same growth path, same reinvestment policy), fair value would be -$25.92 per share (-133.5% vs the $77.47 market price). The gap of -$103.39 per share is the dollar magnitude of the implied margin compression the price-solved scenario above attributes to the margin axis — the second solver knob the model can't turn while reinvestment is held by the s2c ladder.

Rappaport-style reverse-DCF. We start from the current market price ($77.47 × 527.0M shares = $40.83B market cap, $73.83B enterprise value) and solve for the operating path that would justify it.

To reconcile today's price with a plausible scenario, the model lands on:

  • Year-1 revenue growth: 60.0%
    Scenario holds the analyst consensus (absolute forecast, TTM-anchored) of 60.0%.
  • Target EBIT margin (Y10): 11.6%
    Scenario starts 3.0%, ends 11.6% (3-yr range -6.1%–16.9%).
  • High-growth plateau: 4 years
    Trimmed from the 7-year Y2-tier default to 4 by the 10× compound cap — 60.0% for 4y still lifts revenue ~6.6× over base.
  • Starting ROIC held at 0.0% for Y1–Y5
    Recent CapEx 2.27× the 3-yr mean — the scenario credits that investment with future returns, holding ROIC at 0.0% through the harvest window before fading to terminal 9.0%.

at or below the reference above the reference outside the historical band

Where the PV comes from
Y1–3
+0%
Y4–10
+0%
Terminal
+100%

Share of the total PV the model has assigned to each window. The further out a cash flow sits, the harder it is to estimate — so readers can weigh how much of the scenario rests on the near, plateau, and post-horizon periods.


Facts · TTM as of 2026-03-31 (Q12026)

Share price
$77.47
Diluted shares
527.0M
Total debt
$35.15B
Cash & investments
$2.27B
Revenue
$6.23B
EBIT (GAAP)
-$162.5M
EBIT margin (GAAP)
-2.6%
Operating cash flow
$5.98B
CapEx
$16.60B
Observed YoY growth
129.9%
Analyst current-FY growth
146.8%
Analyst next-FY growth
96.7%

Assumptions

Initial revenue growth
60.0%
Year-2 growth
60.0%
Starting EBIT margin
3.0%
Tax rate
21.0%
WACC
9.0%
Starting ROIC
0.0%

Constants

Horizon
10 years
Terminal growth
2.5%
Terminal ROIC
9.0%
Discounting
Mid-year

See the discounting convention, plateau tier rules, and the terminal ROIC fade on the methodology page.


Year-by-year reconciliation

Not a forecast. These are the year-by-year revenue, margin, and cash-flow figures the reverse-DCF solver had to assume for its present value to land on today's enterprise value — the operating path the market price is pricing in, not a view of what the company will deliver.

Year Revenue Growth EBIT Margin NOPAT ROIC Reinvestment FCF Discount PV of FCF
1 $9.96B 60.0% $388.9M 3.9% $307.2M 0.0% $307.2M $0 0.958 $0
2 $15.94B 60.0% $759.0M 4.8% $599.6M 0.0% $599.6M $0 0.879 $0
3 $25.51B 60.0% $1.43B 5.6% $1.13B 0.0% $1.13B $0 0.806 $0
4 $40.81B 60.0% $2.64B 6.5% $2.09B 0.0% $2.09B $0 0.740 $0
5 $61.39B 50.4% $4.50B 7.3% $3.56B 0.0% $3.56B $0 0.679 $0
6 $86.45B 40.8% $7.08B 8.2% $5.60B 1.8% $5.60B $0 0.623 $0
7 $113.47B 31.3% $10.27B 9.0% $8.11B 3.6% $8.11B $0 0.571 $0
8 $138.06B 21.7% $13.68B 9.9% $10.81B 5.4% $10.81B $0 0.524 $0
9 $154.74B 12.1% $16.66B 10.8% $13.16B 7.2% $13.16B $0 0.481 $0
10 $158.61B 2.5% $18.43B 11.6% $14.56B 9.0% $14.56B $0 0.441 $0
Sum of PV of FCF (years 1-10) $0

Terminal value

NOPATN+1
$14.93B
ReinvestmentN+1
$4.05B
FCFN+1
$10.88B
Terminal value (undiscounted)
$167.42B
PV of terminal value
$73.83B
Gordon-growth: TV = FCFN+1 ÷ (WACC − g) = $10.88B ÷ (9.0% − 2.5%).

Equity bridge

PV of operating FCF $0
+ PV of terminal value $73.83B
= Enterprise value $73.83B
− Total debt $35.15B
+ Excess cash $2.14B
total $2.27B − operating $124.5M (2% × TTM revenue)
= Equity value $40.83B
÷ Diluted shares 527.0M
= DCF PV / share $77.47
Market price $77.47
Reconciliation delta +0.0% (≈ 0 by construction)

Full calculation trail Click to expand — every number on this page derived step by step.

0 · TTM reconstruction (anchor: Q12026, 2026-03-31)

The latest filing is a 10-Q, so "base year" revenue / EBIT / OCF / CapEx are reconstructed as trailing-twelve-month values. Per-quarter facts (typical for income-statement items) get summed across four quarters; YTD-cumulative facts (typical for cash-flow items) use prior FY + YTDnow − YTDprior year same quarter.

Revenue
Sum of the four most recent per-quarter values
  • Q1 FY26 (2026-03-31): $2.08B
  • Q4 FY25 (2025-12-31): $1.57B
  • Q3 FY25 (2025-09-30): $1.36B
  • Q2 FY25 (2025-06-30): $1.21B
  • = $6.23B
EBIT
Sum of the four most recent per-quarter values
  • Q1 FY26 (2026-03-31): -$144.0M
  • Q4 FY25 (2025-12-31): -$89.6M
  • Q3 FY25 (2025-09-30): $51.9M
  • Q2 FY25 (2025-06-30): $19.2M
  • = -$162.5M
OCF
Prior FY + current-quarter YTD − same-quarter-prior-year YTD
  • FY FY25 (2025-12-31): +$3.06B
  • Q1 FY26 (2026-03-31) YTD: +$2.98B
  • Q1 FY25 (2025-03-31) YTD: −$61.0M
  • = $5.98B
CapEx
Prior FY + current-quarter YTD − same-quarter-prior-year YTD
  • FY FY25 (2025-12-31): +$10.31B
  • Q1 FY26 (2026-03-31) YTD: +$7.70B
  • Q1 FY25 (2025-03-31) YTD: −$1.41B
  • = $16.60B
Stock-based compensation
Prior FY + current-quarter YTD − same-quarter-prior-year YTD
  • FY FY25 (2025-12-31): +$630.0M
  • Q1 FY26 (2026-03-31) YTD: +$153.0M
  • Q1 FY25 (2025-03-31) YTD: −$184.0M
  • = $599.0M
Prior-year TTM revenue (growth-calc baseline)
Sum of the four most recent per-quarter values
  • Q1 FY25 (2025-03-31): $982.0M
  • Q4 FY25 (2024-12-31): $747.0M
  • Q3 FY25 (2024-09-30): $583.9M
  • Q2 FY25 (2024-06-30): $395.4M
  • = $2.71B

1 · Enterprise-value target (what the DCF must match)

Diluted shares = filing-time diluted weighted-average — point-in-time basic count not tagged in the company-facts API for this filer, period ending 2026-03-31. See the diluted-shares methodology.

Total debt $35.15B bundles:
  • Long-term debt $24.86B LongTermDebt
  • Operating lease liability $10.05B OperatingLeaseLiability
  • Finance lease liability $238.0M FinanceLeaseLiability
Operating- and finance-lease liabilities and any tagged underfunded pension obligation are folded into total debt as Damodaran-style debt-equivalents on top of the financial-debt concepts; see the total-debt methodology.

Cash on this page folds the base cash concept together with marketable / available-for-sale securities ( MarketableSecuritiesCurrent $22.0M ) — the non-operating liquid pile an acquirer would pocket at close. Excluded for insurers and REITs whose investment portfolios back operating liabilities; see the methodology for the full rule.

Cash is split into the operating floor an operating business needs (2% of revenue, Damodaran heuristic) and the distributable surplus that flows to equity holders. Only excess cash is netted against debt because the DCF values the operating business, and the operating cash stays inside it. Banks, insurers, and REITs are exempt — their cash backs deposits / regulatory reserves / investment portfolios rather than working capital. See the methodology.

Fair-value hierarchy on the marketable / AFS / FvNi portion (ASC 820, as of 2026-03-31): L1 $0 (active-market quotes — 0% ), L2 $22.0M (observable inputs — 100% ), L3 $0 (unobservable inputs — 0% ). Reported at par in the equity bridge above; a reader who finds the L3 share large may mentally haircut it. Sourced from us-gaap:AvailableForSaleSecuritiesDebtSecurities under FairValueByFairValueHierarchyLevelAxis. See the methodology.

Market cap     = price × diluted shares
               = $77.47 × 527.0M
               = $40.83B

Total cash     = $2.27B
Operating cash = 2% × revenue = $124.5M
Excess cash    = max(0, total − operating) = $2.14B

EV target      = market cap + total debt − excess cash
               = $40.83B + $35.15B − $2.14B
               = $73.83B
            

2 · Starting NOPAT (base year 0)

Tax rate source: 21% US statutory default (fewer than 2 of the last 3 FYs had a positive effective rate — likely NOL utilisation or one-time items). See the tax-rate methodology for the precedence ladder.

GAAP EBIT          = -$162.5M   (-2.6% of revenue)
× (1 − tax rate)  = × (1 − 21.0%) = × 0.7900
= NOPAT₀            = -$128.4M
            

3 · Invested capital & starting ROIC

Total debt above includes the operating-lease liability ($10.05B). The corresponding ROU asset sits on the balance sheet and flows through book equity via the accounting identity (E = Assets − Liabilities), so IC reflects the post-ASC-842 operating-capital base without an explicit add-back.

Net deferred-tax position (-$194.0M net DTL) stripped from IC. DTAs (NOL / credit carryforwards, post valuation allowance) and DTLs (timing differences from accelerated depreciation) are tax-accounting artifacts, not capital deployed in operations — equity-based IC inadvertently absorbs them via E = Assets − Liabilities, so we back them out so ROIC reflects operating returns on operating capital.

Invested capital = total debt + book equity − excess cash − net deferred tax (−DTL)
                 = $35.15B + $4.76B − $2.14B − -$194.0M
                 = $37.96B

Raw ROIC₀        = NOPAT₀ / Invested capital
                 = -$128.4M / $37.96B
                 = -0.3%
(no cap applied; raw value is within the 40.0% ceiling)
            

4 · WACC derivation

β / Rf / ERP not all available for this filer; a default WACC of 9.0% is used. Per-input decomposition unavailable.

5 · Growth path construction


Source       = analyst consensus (absolute forecast, TTM-anchored): Y1 = 60.0%, Y2 = 60.0%

Detailed derivation:
  Current-FY analyst avg revenue forecast = $12.67B   (FY-over-FY vs FY2025 actual = 146.9%)
  Next-FY analyst avg revenue forecast    = $24.92B   (FY-over-FY vs current-FY forecast = 96.7%)
  Base revenue (TTM) = $6.23B
  Latest completed FY revenue (FY2025) = $5.13B   (denominator for the FY-over-FY check above)

  Y1 = current-FY forecast / TTM base revenue − 1
     = $12.67B / $6.23B − 1
     = 60.0%

  Y2 = next-FY forecast / current-FY forecast − 1
     = $24.92B / $12.67B − 1
     = 60.0%

  Note: the absolute analyst forecast is re-anchored
  against TTM (rather than the FY-over-FY consensus
  rate above) because the TTM base spans the current
  FY only partway. Re-anchoring keeps the growth rate
  consistent with the projection's starting revenue
  level.
Clamp        = [2.5%, 60%] (no sub-terminal or 60%+ starts)
Plateau rate = 60.0% (Y2 — held from year 2 through end of plateau)
Tier         = 7 years (rule: plateau rate < 15% → 3y, < 25% → 5y, else 7y)
Cap trim     = 4 years (compound cap: Y1 × plateau_rate^(n−1) ≤ 10× base)
Plateau      = 4 years
Fade         = linear from effective Y2 to terminal 2.5% across the remaining 6 years

Effective Y1 growth after solver bumps = 60.0%
Effective Y2 growth after solver bumps = 60.0%
Growth by year:
  Y1 = 60.0%
  Y2 = 60.0%
  Y3 = 60.0%
  Y4 = 60.0%
  Y5 = 50.4%
  Y6 = 40.8%
  Y7 = 31.3%
  Y8 = 21.7%
  Y9 = 12.1%
  Y10 = 2.5%
                

6 · Margin path construction

Starting margin (Y0) = 3.0%   (source: 4% TTM + 96% 3-yr mean (gap 5.9pp falls in 4–6pp transition band))
Target margin (Y10)  = 11.6%   (solver output, normal band)
Year-t margin        = starting + (target − starting) × (t / 10)
Margin by year:
  Y1 = 3.9%
  Y2 = 4.8%
  Y3 = 5.6%
  Y4 = 6.5%
  Y5 = 7.3%
  Y6 = 8.2%
  Y7 = 9.0%
  Y8 = 9.9%
  Y9 = 10.8%
  Y10 = 11.6%

Filer-history margin distribution: insufficient history (3 FY available, 8 required); path-stretch flag suppressed.
            

7 · ROIC path construction

The capex heuristic compares latest-period CapEx ($16.60B) against the Normalized CapEx (3-yr mean) of $7.32B — mean of the last three annual CapEx values. When the latest is above 1.4× that mean and CapEx is at least 5% of revenue, we treat the filer as capital-intensive and mid-investment, hold ROIC flat for a 5-year harvest phase, and only then fade to terminal ROIC. The 3-yr mean does not feed the DCF directly — it only gates this flag.

Capex-heuristic active (latest CapEx 2.27× the 3-yr mean of $7.32B).
Y1..Y5  held at ROIC₀ = 0.0%
Y6..Y10 fade linearly to ROIC_terminal = 9.0%

ROIC by year:
  Y1 = 0.0%
  Y2 = 0.0%
  Y3 = 0.0%
  Y4 = 0.0%
  Y5 = 0.0%
  Y6 = 1.8%
  Y7 = 3.6%
  Y8 = 5.4%
  Y9 = 7.2%
  Y10 = 9.0%
            

7a · Reinvestment formula

The Damodaran growth-firm closure Reinvestment_t = ΔRevenue_t ÷ salesToCapital collapses to noise whenever EITHER the 3-year revenue change OR the 3-year net reinvestment is small relative to the revenue base. The model picks the most-honest formula via a 3-tier ladder: tier-1 standard sales-to-capital fires only when both signals carry magnitude AND the resulting ratio sits inside the typical 0.5–8 band; tier-2 substitutes a TTM (CapEx − D&A) ÷ Revenue ratio applied to each projection year's revenue (not its delta); tier-3 falls through to the ΔNOPAT ÷ ROIC closure when neither signal is usable.

Inputs:
  ΔRev_3y                          = n/a
  netReinvest_3y (CapEx − D&A)     = $18.53B
  avgRevenue_3y                    = n/a
  TTM CapEx − D&A                  = $13.44B
  TTM Revenue                      = $6.23B

Tier-1 gates (all three must clear):
  |ΔRev_3y| / avgRev_3y > 1.0%     n/a            ✗ fail
  netReinv_3y / avgRev_3y > 1.5%   n/a            ✗ fail
  0.5 ≤ s2c candidate ≤ 8          n/a            ✗ fail

Tier-2 fires (gate failed: both). Substituting CapEx-of-revenue heuristic.
  capexOfRevenueRatio (raw)        = 215.81%
  capexOfRevenueRatio (used)       = 215.81%
  Reinvestment_t = Revenue_t × 215.81%
            

8 · Solver iterations

Each row is one configuration in the solver ladder; the "Solved margin" column is the result of bisecting the EBIT margin (up to 80 inner iterations) to match the EV target for that row's plateau / Y1 bump / phase. The solver sweeps Y1 growth bumps 0pp → +20pp across the plateau ladder inside the normal margin bracket, then — if nothing reconciles — repeats the same sweep in a widened margin band ([-10%, 80%]). The first feasible row is the one the page uses. If no combination reconciles, the page shows the row whose PV sits closest to the target EV so both levers are balanced.

# Phase Plateau Y1 bump Solved margin PV(EV) vs target Feasible?
1 normal 4y +0pp 11.6% $73.83B +0.0% yes ✓

9 · Terminal value derivation

NOPAT_{N+1}         = NOPAT_{10} × (1 + g_terminal)
                    = $14.56B × (1 + 2.5%)
                    = $14.93B

ΔNOPAT              = NOPAT_{N+1} − NOPAT_{10}
                    = $364.1M
Reinvestment_{N+1}  = ΔNOPAT / ROIC_terminal
                    = $364.1M / 9.0%
                    = $4.05B

FCF_{N+1}           = NOPAT_{N+1} − Reinvestment_{N+1}
                    = $14.93B − $4.05B
                    = $10.88B

Terminal value (TV) = FCF_{N+1} / (WACC − g_terminal)
                    = $10.88B / (9.0% − 2.5%)
                    = $167.42B

PV(TV)              = TV / (1 + WACC)^(10 − 0.5)
                    = $167.42B / 2.268
                    = $73.83B

10 · Reconciliation check (DCF PV vs. the market)

This isn't a fair value — it's the inverse check. The solver built the scenario so that DCF PV reproduces the current enterprise value; if the normal bracket worked the delta below is ~0 by construction. A non-zero delta only appears when the solver fell through to the widened margin band.

Σ PV(FCF_1..10) = $0
+ PV(TV)          = $73.83B
= Enterprise value = $73.83B   (≈ EV target $73.83B by construction)
− Total debt      = $35.15B
+ Excess cash     = $2.14B   (total $2.27B − operating $124.5M)
= Equity value    = $40.83B
÷ Diluted shares  = 527.0M
= DCF PV / share  = $77.47

Market price      = $77.47
Reconciliation Δ  = +0.0%   (≈ 0 by construction — the solver anchored on this price)
                

Open this scenario in the calculator →
Every input above is pre-filled; the calculator auto-runs and lets you override any assumption.

Every rule above — growth-source priority, plateau tiers, compound cap, solver ladder, flag colours — is documented on the expectations scenario methodology.

What these ratios mean & how they're built: see the valuation ratios glossary on the Financials methodology page — per-ratio definitions and the exact us-gaap concepts behind each numerator and denominator.

Sources. Denominators come from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings for CRWV (CIK 0001769628); analyst growth forecasts come from analyst consensus. Filing-anchored figures are rendered server-side at the split-adjusted close on the latest reported period-end — so every ratio reconciles to the same filing as every other figure on this page — and the share price, six ratio cards, EPV gap, and reverse-DCF outputs above re-anchor on the most recent daily close in the browser when JavaScript is enabled. The "Full calculation trail" sections stay anchored to the period-end close so the line-by-line arithmetic still reconciles. Per-share denominators are split-adjusted to today's share count.

Related tickers

LTC

LTC PROPERTIES INC

TELA

TELA Bio, Inc.

CNMD

CONMED CORPORATION