McCormick & Co Inc. (MKC) valuation

Share price $51.53 · Close 2026-04-24

Price-to-Earnings

P/E · Trailing Diluted
8.45×
P/E history →

Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow

P/FCF · Trailing
18.75×
P/FCF history →

Free-Cash-Flow Yield

FCF Yield · Trailing
5.33%
FCF Yield history →

Enterprise-Value-to-EBITDA

EV/EBITDA · Trailing
11.71×
EV/EBITDA history →

Price-to-Sales

P/S · Trailing
1.95×
P/S history →

Price-to-Book

P/B · Latest filing
1.99×
P/B history →

Expectations investing: what does the price imply?

Stress figure — scenario margin 72% above 3-yr max 16%

Rappaport-style reverse-DCF. We start from the current market price ($51.53 × 269.4M shares = $13.88B market cap, $17.32B enterprise value) and solve for the operating path that would justify it.

To reconcile today's price with a plausible scenario, the model lands on:

  • Year-1 revenue growth: 10.8%
    Held at the analyst consensus (absolute forecast, TTM-anchored) of 10.8% — the margin lever absorbs the reconciliation.
  • Target EBIT margin (Y10): 72.0%
    Scenario lands on 72.0%, above the historical band (3-yr range 14.5%–15.8%). The reconciliation needs a margin the filer has not shown.
  • High-growth plateau: 3 years
    Tier default for Y2 at 3.8%.

at or below the reference above the reference outside the historical band

Where the PV comes from
Y1–3
-49%
Y4–10
-28%
Terminal
+177%

Share of the total PV the model has assigned to each window. The further out a cash flow sits, the harder it is to estimate — so readers can weigh how much of the scenario rests on the near, plateau, and post-horizon periods.

Facts · TTM as of 2026-02-28 (Q12026)

Share price
$51.53
Diluted shares
269.4M
Total debt
$3.61B
Cash & equivalents
$177.7M
Revenue
$7.11B
EBIT (GAAP)
$1.07B
EBIT margin (GAAP)
15.1%
Operating cash flow
$897.6M
CapEx
$217.2M
Observed YoY growth
5.7%
Analyst current-FY growth
15.1%
Analyst next-FY growth
3.8%
3-year revenue CAGR
3.8%

Assumptions

Initial revenue growth
10.8%
from analyst consensus (absolute forecast, TTM-anchored)
(analyst FY-over-FY consensus: 15.1% — shown effective rate normalises it against our TTM base, which spans the current FY partway)
Year-2 growth
3.8%
from analyst next-FY consensus
Starting EBIT margin
15.1%
from latest FY EBIT margin (GAAP)
Tax rate
21.4%
from 3-year median of EffectiveTaxRate
Starting ROIC
8.1%
NOPAT₀ ÷ invested capital, capped at 40.0%

Constants

Horizon
10 years
WACC
9.0%
Terminal growth
2.5%
Terminal ROIC
11.0%

Yearly projection

Year Revenue Growth EBIT Margin NOPAT ROIC Reinvestment FCF Discount PV of FCF
1 $7.87B 10.8% $1.64B 20.8% $1.29B 8.4% $5.28B -$3.99B 0.917 -$3.66B
2 $8.17B 3.8% $2.16B 26.5% $1.70B 8.7% $4.77B -$3.07B 0.842 -$2.58B
3 $8.48B 3.8% $2.73B 32.2% $2.14B 9.0% $4.94B -$2.80B 0.772 -$2.16B
4 $8.78B 3.6% $3.32B 37.9% $2.61B 9.3% $5.07B -$2.46B 0.708 -$1.74B
5 $9.08B 3.4% $3.95B 43.5% $3.11B 9.5% $5.18B -$2.08B 0.650 -$1.35B
6 $9.37B 3.2% $4.61B 49.2% $3.62B 9.8% $5.28B -$1.65B 0.596 -$984.4M
7 $9.66B 3.0% $5.30B 54.9% $4.17B 10.1% $5.35B -$1.18B 0.547 -$647.7M
8 $9.93B 2.9% $6.02B 60.6% $4.73B 10.4% $5.41B -$676.0M 0.502 -$339.2M
9 $10.20B 2.7% $6.76B 66.3% $5.31B 10.7% $5.44B -$128.4M 0.460 -$59.1M
10 $10.45B 2.5% $7.53B 72.0% $5.91B 11.0% $5.46B $457.1M 0.422 $193.1M
Sum of PV of FCF (years 1-10) -$13.34B

Terminal value

NOPATN+1
$6.06B
ReinvestmentN+1
$1.34B
FCFN+1
$4.72B
Terminal value (undiscounted)
$72.57B
PV of terminal value
$30.65B
Gordon-growth: TV = FCFN+1 ÷ (WACC − g) = $4.72B ÷ (9.0% − 2.5%).

Equity bridge

PV of operating FCF -$13.34B
+ PV of terminal value $30.65B
= Enterprise value $17.32B
− Total debt $3.61B
+ Cash & equivalents $177.7M
= Equity value $13.88B
÷ Diluted shares 269.4M
= DCF PV / share $51.53
Market price $51.53
Reconciliation delta −0.0% (widened band)
Full calculation trail Click to expand — every number on this page derived step by step.

0 · TTM reconstruction (anchor: Q12026, 2026-02-28)

The latest filing is a 10-Q, so "base year" revenue / EBIT / OCF / CapEx are reconstructed as trailing-twelve-month values. Per-quarter facts (typical for income-statement items) get summed across four quarters; YTD-cumulative facts (typical for cash-flow items) use prior FY + YTDnow − YTDprior year same quarter.

Revenue
Sum of the four most recent per-quarter values
  • Q1 FY26 (2026-02-28): $1.87B
  • Q4 FY25 (2025-11-30): $1.85B
  • Q3 FY25 (2025-08-31): $1.72B
  • Q2 FY25 (2025-05-31): $1.66B
  • = $7.11B
EBIT
Sum of the four most recent per-quarter values
  • Q1 FY26 (2026-02-28): $227.5M
  • Q4 FY25 (2025-11-30): $311.1M
  • Q3 FY25 (2025-08-31): $288.7M
  • Q2 FY25 (2025-05-31): $245.8M
  • = $1.07B
OCF
Prior FY + current-quarter YTD − same-quarter-prior-year YTD
  • FY FY25 (2025-11-30): +$962.2M
  • Q1 FY26 (2026-02-28) YTD: +$50.9M
  • Q1 FY25 (2025-02-28) YTD: −$115.5M
  • = $897.6M
CapEx
Prior FY + current-quarter YTD − same-quarter-prior-year YTD
  • FY FY25 (2025-11-30): +$221.8M
  • Q1 FY26 (2026-02-28) YTD: +$32.5M
  • Q1 FY25 (2025-02-28) YTD: −$37.1M
  • = $217.2M
Prior-year TTM revenue (growth-calc baseline)
Sum of the four most recent per-quarter values
  • Q1 FY25 (2025-02-28): $1.61B
  • Q4 FY24 (2024-11-30): $1.80B
  • Q3 FY24 (2024-08-31): $1.68B
  • Q2 FY24 (2024-05-31): $1.64B
  • = $6.73B

1 · Enterprise-value target (what the DCF must match)

Market cap   = price × diluted shares
             = $51.53 × 269.4M
             = $13.88B

EV target    = market cap + total debt − cash & equivalents
             = $13.88B + $3.61B − $177.7M
             = $17.32B
            

2 · Starting NOPAT (base year 0)

GAAP EBIT          = $1.07B   (15.1% of revenue)
× (1 − tax rate)  = × (1 − 21.4%) = × 0.7855
= NOPAT₀            = $843.0M
            

3 · Invested capital & starting ROIC

Invested capital = total debt + book equity − cash
                 = $3.61B + $6.98B − $177.7M
                 = $10.42B

Raw ROIC₀        = NOPAT₀ / Invested capital
                 = $843.0M / $10.42B
                 = 8.1%
(no cap applied; raw value is within the 40.0% ceiling)
            

4 · Growth path construction

Source       = analyst consensus (absolute forecast, TTM-anchored): Y1 = 10.8%, Y2 = 3.8%
Clamp        = [2.5%, 60%] (no sub-terminal or 60%+ starts)
Plateau rate = 3.8% (Y2 — held from year 2 through end of plateau)
Tier         = 3 years (rule: plateau rate < 15% → 3y, < 25% → 5y, else 7y)
Plateau      = 3 years
Fade         = linear from effective Y2 to terminal 2.5% across the remaining 7 years

Effective Y1 growth after solver bumps = 10.8%
Effective Y2 growth after solver bumps = 3.8%
Growth by year:
  Y1 = 10.8%
  Y2 = 3.8%
  Y3 = 3.8%
  Y4 = 3.6%
  Y5 = 3.4%
  Y6 = 3.2%
  Y7 = 3.0%
  Y8 = 2.9%
  Y9 = 2.7%
  Y10 = 2.5%
            

5 · Margin path construction

Starting margin (Y0) = 15.1%   (source: latest FY EBIT margin (GAAP))
Target margin (Y10)  = 72.0%   (solver output, widened band)
Year-t margin        = starting + (target − starting) × (t / 10)
Margin by year:
  Y1 = 20.8%
  Y2 = 26.5%
  Y3 = 32.2%
  Y4 = 37.9%
  Y5 = 43.5%
  Y6 = 49.2%
  Y7 = 54.9%
  Y8 = 60.6%
  Y9 = 66.3%
  Y10 = 72.0%
            

6 · ROIC path construction

The capex heuristic compares latest-period CapEx ($217.2M) against the Normalized CapEx (3-yr mean) of $253.5M — mean of the last three annual CapEx values. When the latest is above 1.4× that mean and CapEx is at least 5% of revenue, we treat the filer as capital-intensive and mid-investment, hold ROIC flat for a 5-year harvest phase, and only then fade to terminal ROIC. The 3-yr mean does not feed the DCF directly — it only gates this flag.

Capex-heuristic inactive (latest CapEx 0.86× the 3-yr mean of $253.5M — below the 1.4× / 5%-of-revenue gates).
Fade from Y1: ROIC_t = ROIC₀ + (ROIC_terminal − ROIC₀) × (t / 10)
ROIC₀ = 8.1%; ROIC_terminal = 11.0%

ROIC by year:
  Y1 = 8.4%
  Y2 = 8.7%
  Y3 = 9.0%
  Y4 = 9.3%
  Y5 = 9.5%
  Y6 = 9.8%
  Y7 = 10.1%
  Y8 = 10.4%
  Y9 = 10.7%
  Y10 = 11.0%
            

7 · Solver iterations

Each row is one bisection attempt. The solver sweeps Y1 growth bumps 0pp → +20pp across the plateau ladder inside the normal margin bracket, then — if nothing reconciles — repeats the same sweep in a widened margin band ([-10%, 80%]). The first feasible attempt is the one the page uses. If no combination reconciles, the page shows the attempt whose PV sits closest to the target EV so both levers are balanced.

# Phase Plateau Y1 bump Solved margin PV(EV) vs target Feasible?
1 normal 3y +0pp 18.1% $10.68B −38.3% no
2 normal 3y +2pp 18.1% $10.93B −36.9% no
3 normal 3y +4pp 18.1% $11.22B −35.2% no
4 normal 3y +6pp 18.1% $11.53B −33.4% no
5 normal 3y +8pp 18.1% $11.88B −31.4% no
6 normal 3y +10pp 18.1% $12.27B −29.2% no
7 normal 3y +12pp 18.1% $12.69B −26.7% no
8 normal 3y +14pp 18.1% $13.16B −24.0% no
9 normal 3y +16pp 18.1% $13.68B −21.0% no
10 normal 3y +18pp 18.1% $14.26B −17.7% no
11 normal 3y +20pp 18.1% $14.88B −14.1% no
12 normal 5y +0pp 18.1% $10.71B −38.1% no
13 normal 5y +2pp 18.1% $11.02B −36.4% no
14 normal 5y +4pp 18.1% $11.37B −34.3% no
15 normal 5y +6pp 18.1% $11.77B −32.0% no
16 normal 5y +8pp 18.1% $12.22B −29.4% no
17 normal 5y +10pp 18.1% $12.73B −26.5% no
18 normal 5y +12pp 18.1% $13.30B −23.2% no
19 normal 5y +14pp 18.1% $13.94B −19.5% no
20 normal 5y +16pp 18.1% $14.65B −15.4% no
21 normal 5y +18pp 18.1% $15.44B −10.8% no
22 normal 5y +20pp 18.1% $16.33B −5.7% no
23 widened 3y +0pp 72.0% $17.32B −0.0% yes ✓

8 · Terminal value derivation

NOPAT_{N+1}         = NOPAT_{10} × (1 + g_terminal)
                    = $5.91B × (1 + 2.5%)
                    = $6.06B

ΔNOPAT              = NOPAT_{N+1} − NOPAT_{10}
                    = $147.8M
Reinvestment_{N+1}  = ΔNOPAT / ROIC_terminal
                    = $147.8M / 11.0%
                    = $1.34B

FCF_{N+1}           = NOPAT_{N+1} − Reinvestment_{N+1}
                    = $6.06B − $1.34B
                    = $4.72B

Terminal value (TV) = FCF_{N+1} / (WACC − g_terminal)
                    = $4.72B / (9.0% − 2.5%)
                    = $72.57B

PV(TV)              = TV / (1 + WACC)^10
                    = $72.57B / 2.367
                    = $30.65B
            

9 · Reconciliation check (DCF PV vs. the market)

This isn't a fair value — it's the inverse check. The solver built the scenario so that DCF PV reproduces the current enterprise value; if the normal bracket worked the delta below is ~0 by construction. A non-zero delta only appears when the solver fell through to the widened margin band.

Σ PV(FCF_1..10) = -$13.34B
+ PV(TV)          = $30.65B
= Enterprise value = $17.32B   (widened solve — may differ from EV target)
− Total debt      = $3.61B
+ Cash            = $177.7M
= Equity value    = $13.88B
÷ Diluted shares  = 269.4M
= DCF PV / share  = $51.53

Market price      = $51.53
Reconciliation Δ  = −0.0%   (widened band — residual gap the scenario could not close)
            
Open this scenario in the calculator →
Every input above is pre-filled; the calculator auto-runs and lets you override any assumption.

Every rule above — growth-source priority, plateau tiers, compound cap, solver ladder, flag colours — is documented on the expectations scenario methodology.

What these ratios mean & how they're built: see the valuation ratios glossary on the company-facts methodology page — per-ratio definitions and the exact us-gaap concepts behind each numerator and denominator.

Sources. Denominators come from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings for MKC (CIK 0000063754); analyst growth forecasts come from analyst consensus. Share price is the latest split-adjusted close from our daily history (live quote as fallback). Per-share denominators are split-adjusted to today's share count.