SERVICENOW, INC. (NOW) valuation

Share price $90.17 · Close 2026-04-24

Price-to-Earnings

P/E · Trailing Diluted
53.61×
P/E history →

Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow

P/FCF · Trailing
20.62×
P/FCF history →

Free-Cash-Flow Yield

FCF Yield · Trailing
4.85%
FCF Yield history →

Enterprise-Value-to-EBITDA

EV/EBITDA · Trailing
28.47×
EV/EBITDA history →

Price-to-Sales

P/S · Trailing
6.66×
P/S history →

Price-to-Book

P/B · Latest filing
7.93×
P/B history →

Expectations investing: what does the price imply?

Stress figure — scenario margin 74% above 3-yr max 14%

Rappaport-style reverse-DCF. We start from the current market price ($90.17 × 1.03B shares = $92.99B market cap, $91.23B enterprise value) and solve for the operating path that would justify it.

To reconcile today's price with a plausible scenario, the model lands on:

  • Year-1 revenue growth: 16.0%
    Held at the analyst consensus (absolute forecast, TTM-anchored) of 16.0% — the margin lever absorbs the reconciliation.
  • Target EBIT margin (Y10): 73.8%
    Scenario lands on 73.8%, above the historical band (3-yr range 8.5%–13.7%). The reconciliation needs a margin the filer has not shown.
  • High-growth plateau: 5 years
    Tier default for Y2 at 18.0%.

at or below the reference above the reference outside the historical band

Where the PV comes from
Y1–3
-16%
Y4–10
-38%
Terminal
+154%

Share of the total PV the model has assigned to each window. The further out a cash flow sits, the harder it is to estimate — so readers can weigh how much of the scenario rests on the near, plateau, and post-horizon periods.

Facts · TTM as of 2026-03-31 (Q12026)

Share price
$90.17
Diluted shares
1.03B
Total debt
$940.0M
Cash & equivalents
$2.70B
Revenue
$13.96B
EBIT (GAAP)
$1.88B
EBIT margin (GAAP)
13.4%
Operating cash flow
$5.44B
CapEx
$804.0M
Observed YoY growth
21.7%
Analyst current-FY growth
22.0%
Analyst next-FY growth
18.0%
3-year revenue CAGR
24.4%

Assumptions

Initial revenue growth
16.0%
from analyst consensus (absolute forecast, TTM-anchored)
(analyst FY-over-FY consensus: 22.0% — shown effective rate normalises it against our TTM base, which spans the current FY partway)
Year-2 growth
18.0%
from analyst next-FY consensus
Starting EBIT margin
13.4%
from latest FY EBIT margin (GAAP)
Tax rate
22.7%
from latest FY EffectiveTaxRate
Starting ROIC
14.6%
NOPAT₀ ÷ invested capital, capped at 40.0%

Constants

Horizon
10 years
WACC
9.0%
Terminal growth
2.5%
Terminal ROIC
11.0%

Yearly projection

Year Revenue Growth EBIT Margin NOPAT ROIC Reinvestment FCF Discount PV of FCF
1 $16.19B 16.0% $3.15B 19.5% $2.44B 14.2% $6.96B -$4.52B 0.917 -$4.15B
2 $19.11B 18.0% $4.88B 25.5% $3.77B 13.8% $9.62B -$5.85B 0.842 -$4.93B
3 $22.56B 18.0% $7.12B 31.6% $5.50B 13.5% $12.85B -$7.35B 0.772 -$5.67B
4 $26.63B 18.0% $10.01B 37.6% $7.74B 13.1% $17.02B -$9.28B 0.708 -$6.58B
5 $31.43B 18.0% $13.71B 43.6% $10.60B 12.8% $22.40B -$11.80B 0.650 -$7.67B
6 $36.12B 14.9% $17.94B 49.7% $13.87B 12.4% $26.31B -$12.44B 0.596 -$7.42B
7 $40.39B 11.8% $22.50B 55.7% $17.39B 12.1% $29.21B -$11.82B 0.547 -$6.46B
8 $43.91B 8.7% $27.11B 61.7% $20.96B 11.7% $30.44B -$9.48B 0.502 -$4.76B
9 $46.37B 5.6% $31.43B 67.8% $24.30B 11.4% $29.41B -$5.11B 0.460 -$2.35B
10 $47.53B 2.5% $35.08B 73.8% $27.12B 11.0% $25.69B $1.43B 0.422 $605.1M
Sum of PV of FCF (years 1-10) -$49.38B

Terminal value

NOPATN+1
$27.80B
ReinvestmentN+1
$6.16B
FCFN+1
$21.64B
Terminal value (undiscounted)
$332.88B
PV of terminal value
$140.61B
Gordon-growth: TV = FCFN+1 ÷ (WACC − g) = $21.64B ÷ (9.0% − 2.5%).

Equity bridge

PV of operating FCF -$49.38B
+ PV of terminal value $140.61B
= Enterprise value $91.23B
− Total debt $940.0M
+ Cash & equivalents $2.70B
= Equity value $92.99B
÷ Diluted shares 1.03B
= DCF PV / share $90.17
Market price $90.17
Reconciliation delta +0.0% (widened band)
Full calculation trail Click to expand — every number on this page derived step by step.

0 · TTM reconstruction (anchor: Q12026, 2026-03-31)

The latest filing is a 10-Q, so "base year" revenue / EBIT / OCF / CapEx are reconstructed as trailing-twelve-month values. Per-quarter facts (typical for income-statement items) get summed across four quarters; YTD-cumulative facts (typical for cash-flow items) use prior FY + YTDnow − YTDprior year same quarter.

Revenue
Sum of the four most recent per-quarter values
  • Q1 FY26 (2026-03-31): $3.77B
  • Q4 FY25 (2025-12-31): $3.57B
  • Q3 FY25 (2025-09-30): $3.41B
  • Q2 FY25 (2025-06-30): $3.21B
  • = $13.96B
EBIT
Sum of the four most recent per-quarter values
  • Q1 FY26 (2026-03-31): $503.0M
  • Q4 FY25 (2025-12-31): $443.0M
  • Q3 FY25 (2025-09-30): $572.0M
  • Q2 FY25 (2025-06-30): $358.0M
  • = $1.88B
OCF
Prior FY + current-quarter YTD − same-quarter-prior-year YTD
  • FY FY25 (2025-12-31): +$5.44B
  • Q1 FY26 (2026-03-31) YTD: +$1.67B
  • Q1 FY25 (2025-03-31) YTD: −$1.68B
  • = $5.44B
CapEx
Prior FY + current-quarter YTD − same-quarter-prior-year YTD
  • FY FY25 (2025-12-31): +$868.0M
  • Q1 FY26 (2026-03-31) YTD: +$141.0M
  • Q1 FY25 (2025-03-31) YTD: −$205.0M
  • = $804.0M
Prior-year TTM revenue (growth-calc baseline)
Sum of the four most recent per-quarter values
  • Q1 FY25 (2025-03-31): $3.09B
  • Q4 FY24 (2024-12-31): $2.96B
  • Q3 FY24 (2024-09-30): $2.80B
  • Q2 FY24 (2024-06-30): $2.63B
  • = $11.47B

1 · Enterprise-value target (what the DCF must match)

Market cap   = price × diluted shares
             = $90.17 × 1.03B
             = $92.99B

EV target    = market cap + total debt − cash & equivalents
             = $92.99B + $940.0M − $2.70B
             = $91.23B
            

2 · Starting NOPAT (base year 0)

GAAP EBIT          = $1.88B   (13.4% of revenue)
× (1 − tax rate)  = × (1 − 22.7%) = × 0.7731
= NOPAT₀            = $1.45B
            

3 · Invested capital & starting ROIC

Invested capital = total debt + book equity − cash
                 = $940.0M + $11.73B − $2.70B
                 = $9.97B

Raw ROIC₀        = NOPAT₀ / Invested capital
                 = $1.45B / $9.97B
                 = 14.6%
(no cap applied; raw value is within the 40.0% ceiling)
            

4 · Growth path construction

Source       = analyst consensus (absolute forecast, TTM-anchored): Y1 = 16.0%, Y2 = 18.0%
Clamp        = [2.5%, 60%] (no sub-terminal or 60%+ starts)
Plateau rate = 18.0% (Y2 — held from year 2 through end of plateau)
Tier         = 5 years (rule: plateau rate < 15% → 3y, < 25% → 5y, else 7y)
Plateau      = 5 years
Fade         = linear from effective Y2 to terminal 2.5% across the remaining 5 years

Effective Y1 growth after solver bumps = 16.0%
Effective Y2 growth after solver bumps = 18.0%
Growth by year:
  Y1 = 16.0%
  Y2 = 18.0%
  Y3 = 18.0%
  Y4 = 18.0%
  Y5 = 18.0%
  Y6 = 14.9%
  Y7 = 11.8%
  Y8 = 8.7%
  Y9 = 5.6%
  Y10 = 2.5%
            

5 · Margin path construction

Starting margin (Y0) = 13.4%   (source: latest FY EBIT margin (GAAP))
Target margin (Y10)  = 73.8%   (solver output, widened band)
Year-t margin        = starting + (target − starting) × (t / 10)
Margin by year:
  Y1 = 19.5%
  Y2 = 25.5%
  Y3 = 31.6%
  Y4 = 37.6%
  Y5 = 43.6%
  Y6 = 49.7%
  Y7 = 55.7%
  Y8 = 61.7%
  Y9 = 67.8%
  Y10 = 73.8%
            

6 · ROIC path construction

The capex heuristic compares latest-period CapEx ($804.0M) against the Normalized CapEx (3-yr mean) of $804.7M — mean of the last three annual CapEx values. When the latest is above 1.4× that mean and CapEx is at least 5% of revenue, we treat the filer as capital-intensive and mid-investment, hold ROIC flat for a 5-year harvest phase, and only then fade to terminal ROIC. The 3-yr mean does not feed the DCF directly — it only gates this flag.

Capex-heuristic inactive (latest CapEx 1.00× the 3-yr mean of $804.7M — below the 1.4× / 5%-of-revenue gates).
Fade from Y1: ROIC_t = ROIC₀ + (ROIC_terminal − ROIC₀) × (t / 10)
ROIC₀ = 14.6%; ROIC_terminal = 11.0%

ROIC by year:
  Y1 = 14.2%
  Y2 = 13.8%
  Y3 = 13.5%
  Y4 = 13.1%
  Y5 = 12.8%
  Y6 = 12.4%
  Y7 = 12.1%
  Y8 = 11.7%
  Y9 = 11.4%
  Y10 = 11.0%
            

7 · Solver iterations

Each row is one bisection attempt. The solver sweeps Y1 growth bumps 0pp → +20pp across the plateau ladder inside the normal margin bracket, then — if nothing reconciles — repeats the same sweep in a widened margin band ([-10%, 80%]). The first feasible attempt is the one the page uses. If no combination reconciles, the page shows the attempt whose PV sits closest to the target EV so both levers are balanced.

# Phase Plateau Y1 bump Solved margin PV(EV) vs target Feasible?
1 normal 5y +0pp 16.1% $31.01B −66.0% no
2 normal 5y +2pp 16.1% $33.31B −63.5% no
3 normal 5y +4pp 16.1% $35.84B −60.7% no
4 normal 5y +6pp 16.1% $38.61B −57.7% no
5 normal 5y +8pp 16.1% $41.66B −54.3% no
6 normal 5y +10pp 16.1% $44.99B −50.7% no
7 normal 5y +12pp 16.1% $48.64B −46.7% no
8 normal 5y +14pp 16.1% $52.63B −42.3% no
9 normal 5y +16pp 16.1% $56.99B −37.5% no
10 normal 5y +18pp 16.1% $61.75B −32.3% no
11 normal 5y +20pp 16.1% $66.94B −26.6% no
12 normal 7y +0pp 16.1% $33.10B −63.7% no
13 normal 7y +2pp 16.1% $35.95B −60.6% no
14 normal 7y +4pp 16.1% $39.13B −57.1% no
15 normal 7y +6pp 16.1% $42.67B −53.2% no
16 normal 7y +8pp 16.1% $46.60B −48.9% no
17 normal 7y +10pp 16.1% $50.97B −44.1% no
18 normal 7y +12pp 16.1% $55.81B −38.8% no
19 normal 7y +14pp 16.1% $61.17B −33.0% no
20 normal 7y +16pp 16.1% $67.09B −26.5% no
21 normal 7y +18pp 16.1% $73.64B −19.3% no
22 normal 7y +20pp 16.1% $80.88B −11.4% no
23 widened 5y +0pp 73.8% $91.23B +0.0% yes ✓

8 · Terminal value derivation

NOPAT_{N+1}         = NOPAT_{10} × (1 + g_terminal)
                    = $27.12B × (1 + 2.5%)
                    = $27.80B

ΔNOPAT              = NOPAT_{N+1} − NOPAT_{10}
                    = $678.1M
Reinvestment_{N+1}  = ΔNOPAT / ROIC_terminal
                    = $678.1M / 11.0%
                    = $6.16B

FCF_{N+1}           = NOPAT_{N+1} − Reinvestment_{N+1}
                    = $27.80B − $6.16B
                    = $21.64B

Terminal value (TV) = FCF_{N+1} / (WACC − g_terminal)
                    = $21.64B / (9.0% − 2.5%)
                    = $332.88B

PV(TV)              = TV / (1 + WACC)^10
                    = $332.88B / 2.367
                    = $140.61B
            

9 · Reconciliation check (DCF PV vs. the market)

This isn't a fair value — it's the inverse check. The solver built the scenario so that DCF PV reproduces the current enterprise value; if the normal bracket worked the delta below is ~0 by construction. A non-zero delta only appears when the solver fell through to the widened margin band.

Σ PV(FCF_1..10) = -$49.38B
+ PV(TV)          = $140.61B
= Enterprise value = $91.23B   (widened solve — may differ from EV target)
− Total debt      = $940.0M
+ Cash            = $2.70B
= Equity value    = $92.99B
÷ Diluted shares  = 1.03B
= DCF PV / share  = $90.17

Market price      = $90.17
Reconciliation Δ  = +0.0%   (widened band — residual gap the scenario could not close)
            
Open this scenario in the calculator →
Every input above is pre-filled; the calculator auto-runs and lets you override any assumption.

Every rule above — growth-source priority, plateau tiers, compound cap, solver ladder, flag colours — is documented on the expectations scenario methodology.

What these ratios mean & how they're built: see the valuation ratios glossary on the company-facts methodology page — per-ratio definitions and the exact us-gaap concepts behind each numerator and denominator.

Sources. Denominators come from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings for NOW (CIK 0001373715); analyst growth forecasts come from analyst consensus. Share price is the latest split-adjusted close from our daily history (live quote as fallback). Per-share denominators are split-adjusted to today's share count.